| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since new display controller is called "dpu" instead of "mdp". Lets
make the name of the toplevel directory for the display controllers a
bit more generic.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
|
|
Dynamically assign a right mixer to mdp5_crtc_state in the CRTC's
atomic_check path. Assigning the right mixer has some constraints,
i.e, only a few LMs can be paired together. Update mdp5_mixer_assign
to handle these constraints.
Firstly, we need to identify whether we need a right mixer or not.
At the moment, there are 2 scenarios where a right mixer might be
needed:
- If any of the planes connected to this CRTC is too wide (i.e, is
comprised of 2 hwpipes).
- If the CRTC's mode itself is too wide (i.e, a 4K mode on HDMI).
We implement both these checks in the mdp5_crtc_atomic_check(), and
pass 'need_right_mixer' to mdp5_setup_pipeline.
If a CRTC is already assigned a single mixer, and a new atomic commit
brings in a drm_plane that needs 2 hwpipes, we can successfully commit
this mode without requiring a full modeset, provided that we still use
the previously assigned mixer as the left mixer. If such an assignment
isn't possible, we'd need to do a full modeset. This scenario has been
ignored for now.
The mixer assignment code is a bit messy, considering we have at most
4 LM instances in hardware. This can probably be re-visited later with
simplified logic.
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
In the last few commits, we've been adding params to mdp5_crtc_state, and
assigning them in the atomic_check() funcs. Now it's time to actually
start using them.
Remove the duplicated params from the mdp5_crtc struct, and start using
them in the mdp5_crtc code. The majority of the references to these params
is in code that executes after the atomic swap has occurred, so it's okay
to use crtc->state in them. There are a couple of legacy LM cursor ops that
may not use the updated state, but (I think) it's okay to live with that.
Now that we dynamically allocate a mixer to the CRTC, we can also remove
the static assignment to it in mdp5_crtc_init, and also drop the code that
skipped init-ing WB bound mixers (those will now be rejected by
mdp5_mixer_assign()).
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
Add the stuff needed to allow dynamically assigning a mixer to a CRTC.
Since mixers are a resource that can be shared across multiple CRTCs, we
need to maintain a 'hwmixer_to_crtc' map in the global atomic state,
acquire the mdp5_kms.state_lock modeset lock and so on.
The mixer is assigned in the CRTC's atomic_check() func, a failure will
result in the new state being cleanly rolled back.
The mixer assignment itself is straightforward, and almost identical to
what we do for hwpipes. We don't need to grab the old hwmixer_to_crtc
state like we do in hwpipes since we don't need to compare anything
with the old state at the moment.
The only LM capability we care about at the moment is whether the mixer
instance can be used to display stuff (i.e, connect to an INTF
downstream).
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
Use the mdp5_hw_mixer struct in the mdp5_crtc and mdp5_ctl instead of
using the LM index.
Like before, the Layer Mixers are assigned statically to the CRTCs.
The hwmixer(s) will later be dynamically assigned to CRTCs.
For now, ignore the hwmixers that can only do WB.
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
|
Create a struct to represent MDP5 Layer Mixer instances. This will
eventually allow us to detach CRTCs from the Layer Mixers, and
generally clean things up a bit.
This is very similar to how hwpipes were previously abstracted away
from drm planes.
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
|
