diff options
| author | Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com> | 2026-01-28 05:03:10 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> | 2026-02-04 12:51:46 +0300 |
| commit | d317e2ef9dcf673c9f37cda784284af7c6812757 (patch) | |
| tree | 6d61d3577463606b53d0fdd69924a37274eba319 /tools | |
| parent | 24d479d26b25bce5faea3ddd9fa8f3a6c3129ea7 (diff) | |
| download | linux-d317e2ef9dcf673c9f37cda784284af7c6812757.tar.xz | |
selftests/futex: Fix incorrect result reporting of futex_requeue test item
When using the TEST_HARNESS_MAIN macro definition to declare the main
function, it is required to use the EXPECT*() and ASSERT*() macros in
conjunction and not ksft_test_result_*(). Otherwise, even if a test item
fails, the test will still return a success result because
ksft_test_result_*() does not affect the test harness state.
Convert the code to use EXPECT/ASSERT() variants, which ensures that the
overall test result is fail if one of the EXPECT()s fails.
[ tglx: Massaged change log to explain _why_ ksft_test_result*() is the wrong
choice ]
Fixes: f341a20f6d7e ("selftests/futex: Refactor futex_requeue with kselftest_harness.h")
Signed-off-by: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/tencent_51851B741CC4B5EC9C22AFF70BA82BB60805@qq.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c index 35d4be23db5d..dcf0d5f2f312 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c @@ -34,34 +34,18 @@ TEST(requeue_single) volatile futex_t _f1 = 0; volatile futex_t f2 = 0; pthread_t waiter[10]; - int res; f1 = &_f1; /* * Requeue a waiter from f1 to f2, and wake f2. */ - if (pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, NULL)) - ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_create failed\n"); + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, NULL)); usleep(WAKE_WAIT_US); - ksft_print_dbg_msg("Requeuing 1 futex from f1 to f2\n"); - res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0); - if (res != 1) - ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue simple returned: %d %s\n", - res ? errno : res, - res ? strerror(errno) : ""); - - ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking 1 futex at f2\n"); - res = futex_wake(&f2, 1, 0); - if (res != 1) { - ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue simple returned: %d %s\n", - res ? errno : res, - res ? strerror(errno) : ""); - } else { - ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue simple succeeds\n"); - } + EXPECT_EQ(1, futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, futex_wake(&f2, 1, 0)); } TEST(requeue_multiple) @@ -69,7 +53,7 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple) volatile futex_t _f1 = 0; volatile futex_t f2 = 0; pthread_t waiter[10]; - int res, i; + int i; f1 = &_f1; @@ -77,30 +61,13 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple) * Create 10 waiters at f1. At futex_requeue, wake 3 and requeue 7. * At futex_wake, wake INT_MAX (should be exactly 7). */ - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { - if (pthread_create(&waiter[i], NULL, waiterfn, NULL)) - ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_create failed\n"); - } + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&waiter[i], NULL, waiterfn, NULL)); usleep(WAKE_WAIT_US); - ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking 3 futexes at f1 and requeuing 7 futexes from f1 to f2\n"); - res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0); - if (res != 10) { - ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue many returned: %d %s\n", - res ? errno : res, - res ? strerror(errno) : ""); - } - - ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking INT_MAX futexes at f2\n"); - res = futex_wake(&f2, INT_MAX, 0); - if (res != 7) { - ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue many returned: %d %s\n", - res ? errno : res, - res ? strerror(errno) : ""); - } else { - ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue many succeeds\n"); - } + EXPECT_EQ(10, futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0)); + EXPECT_EQ(7, futex_wake(&f2, INT_MAX, 0)); } TEST_HARNESS_MAIN |
