summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com>2026-01-28 05:03:10 +0300
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>2026-02-04 12:51:46 +0300
commitd317e2ef9dcf673c9f37cda784284af7c6812757 (patch)
tree6d61d3577463606b53d0fdd69924a37274eba319
parent24d479d26b25bce5faea3ddd9fa8f3a6c3129ea7 (diff)
downloadlinux-d317e2ef9dcf673c9f37cda784284af7c6812757.tar.xz
selftests/futex: Fix incorrect result reporting of futex_requeue test item
When using the TEST_HARNESS_MAIN macro definition to declare the main function, it is required to use the EXPECT*() and ASSERT*() macros in conjunction and not ksft_test_result_*(). Otherwise, even if a test item fails, the test will still return a success result because ksft_test_result_*() does not affect the test harness state. Convert the code to use EXPECT/ASSERT() variants, which ensures that the overall test result is fail if one of the EXPECT()s fails. [ tglx: Massaged change log to explain _why_ ksft_test_result*() is the wrong choice ] Fixes: f341a20f6d7e ("selftests/futex: Refactor futex_requeue with kselftest_harness.h") Signed-off-by: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/tencent_51851B741CC4B5EC9C22AFF70BA82BB60805@qq.com
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c49
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
index 35d4be23db5d..dcf0d5f2f312 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
@@ -34,34 +34,18 @@ TEST(requeue_single)
volatile futex_t _f1 = 0;
volatile futex_t f2 = 0;
pthread_t waiter[10];
- int res;
f1 = &_f1;
/*
* Requeue a waiter from f1 to f2, and wake f2.
*/
- if (pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, NULL))
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_create failed\n");
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, NULL));
usleep(WAKE_WAIT_US);
- ksft_print_dbg_msg("Requeuing 1 futex from f1 to f2\n");
- res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0);
- if (res != 1)
- ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue simple returned: %d %s\n",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
-
- ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking 1 futex at f2\n");
- res = futex_wake(&f2, 1, 0);
- if (res != 1) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue simple returned: %d %s\n",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- } else {
- ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue simple succeeds\n");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, futex_wake(&f2, 1, 0));
}
TEST(requeue_multiple)
@@ -69,7 +53,7 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple)
volatile futex_t _f1 = 0;
volatile futex_t f2 = 0;
pthread_t waiter[10];
- int res, i;
+ int i;
f1 = &_f1;
@@ -77,30 +61,13 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple)
* Create 10 waiters at f1. At futex_requeue, wake 3 and requeue 7.
* At futex_wake, wake INT_MAX (should be exactly 7).
*/
- for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
- if (pthread_create(&waiter[i], NULL, waiterfn, NULL))
- ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_create failed\n");
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&waiter[i], NULL, waiterfn, NULL));
usleep(WAKE_WAIT_US);
- ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking 3 futexes at f1 and requeuing 7 futexes from f1 to f2\n");
- res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0);
- if (res != 10) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue many returned: %d %s\n",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- }
-
- ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking INT_MAX futexes at f2\n");
- res = futex_wake(&f2, INT_MAX, 0);
- if (res != 7) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue many returned: %d %s\n",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- } else {
- ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue many succeeds\n");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(10, futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(7, futex_wake(&f2, INT_MAX, 0));
}
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN