summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>2015-12-05 16:42:07 +0300
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>2015-12-15 14:51:02 +0300
commitc014953d84ec21a4df9a43be2378861ea6e9246e (patch)
tree72af8d8752c59bc9c59c96c70616a911f4a107a1 /arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
parent77f1b959b0b6db7a7941b4b4f9d3d287c67d7c15 (diff)
downloadlinux-c014953d84ec21a4df9a43be2378861ea6e9246e.tar.xz
ARM: fix uaccess_with_memcpy() with SW_DOMAIN_PAN
The uaccess_with_memcpy() code is currently incompatible with the SW PAN code: it takes locks within the region that we've changed the DACR, potentially sleeping as a result. As we do not save and restore the DACR across co-operative sleep events, can lead to an incorrect DACR value later in this code path. Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c29
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
index d72b90905132..588bbc288396 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ pin_page_for_write(const void __user *_addr, pte_t **ptep, spinlock_t **ptlp)
static unsigned long noinline
__copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
{
+ unsigned long ua_flags;
int atomic;
if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) {
@@ -118,7 +119,9 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
if (tocopy > n)
tocopy = n;
+ ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
memcpy((void *)to, from, tocopy);
+ uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
to += tocopy;
from += tocopy;
n -= tocopy;
@@ -145,14 +148,21 @@ arm_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
* With frame pointer disabled, tail call optimization kicks in
* as well making this test almost invisible.
*/
- if (n < 64)
- return __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n);
- return __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n);
+ if (n < 64) {
+ unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
+ n = __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n);
+ uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
+ } else {
+ n = __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n);
+ }
+ return n;
}
static unsigned long noinline
__clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
{
+ unsigned long ua_flags;
+
if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) {
memset((void *)addr, 0, n);
return 0;
@@ -175,7 +185,9 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
if (tocopy > n)
tocopy = n;
+ ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
memset((void *)addr, 0, tocopy);
+ uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
addr += tocopy;
n -= tocopy;
@@ -193,9 +205,14 @@ out:
unsigned long arm_clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
{
/* See rational for this in __copy_to_user() above. */
- if (n < 64)
- return __clear_user_std(addr, n);
- return __clear_user_memset(addr, n);
+ if (n < 64) {
+ unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
+ n = __clear_user_std(addr, n);
+ uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
+ } else {
+ n = __clear_user_memset(addr, n);
+ }
+ return n;
}
#if 0