diff options
| author | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2015-12-05 16:42:07 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> | 2015-12-15 14:51:02 +0300 |
| commit | c014953d84ec21a4df9a43be2378861ea6e9246e (patch) | |
| tree | 72af8d8752c59bc9c59c96c70616a911f4a107a1 /arch/arm/lib | |
| parent | 77f1b959b0b6db7a7941b4b4f9d3d287c67d7c15 (diff) | |
| download | linux-c014953d84ec21a4df9a43be2378861ea6e9246e.tar.xz | |
ARM: fix uaccess_with_memcpy() with SW_DOMAIN_PAN
The uaccess_with_memcpy() code is currently incompatible with the SW
PAN code: it takes locks within the region that we've changed the DACR,
potentially sleeping as a result. As we do not save and restore the
DACR across co-operative sleep events, can lead to an incorrect DACR
value later in this code path.
Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c | 29 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c index d72b90905132..588bbc288396 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ pin_page_for_write(const void __user *_addr, pte_t **ptep, spinlock_t **ptlp) static unsigned long noinline __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { + unsigned long ua_flags; int atomic; if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) { @@ -118,7 +119,9 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) if (tocopy > n) tocopy = n; + ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); memcpy((void *)to, from, tocopy); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); to += tocopy; from += tocopy; n -= tocopy; @@ -145,14 +148,21 @@ arm_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) * With frame pointer disabled, tail call optimization kicks in * as well making this test almost invisible. */ - if (n < 64) - return __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n); - return __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n); + if (n < 64) { + unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); + n = __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); + } else { + n = __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n); + } + return n; } static unsigned long noinline __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) { + unsigned long ua_flags; + if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) { memset((void *)addr, 0, n); return 0; @@ -175,7 +185,9 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) if (tocopy > n) tocopy = n; + ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); memset((void *)addr, 0, tocopy); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); addr += tocopy; n -= tocopy; @@ -193,9 +205,14 @@ out: unsigned long arm_clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) { /* See rational for this in __copy_to_user() above. */ - if (n < 64) - return __clear_user_std(addr, n); - return __clear_user_memset(addr, n); + if (n < 64) { + unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); + n = __clear_user_std(addr, n); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); + } else { + n = __clear_user_memset(addr, n); + } + return n; } #if 0 |