summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/uprobes.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-12-09uprobes: Reuse return_instances between multiple uretprobes within taskAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+5
Instead of constantly allocating and freeing very short-lived struct return_instance, reuse it as much as possible within current task. For that, store a linked list of reusable return_instances within current->utask. The only complication is that ri_timer() might be still processing such return_instance. And so while the main uretprobe processing logic might be already done with return_instance and would be OK to immediately reuse it for the next uretprobe instance, it's not correct to unconditionally reuse it just like that. Instead we make sure that ri_timer() can't possibly be processing it by using seqcount_t, with ri_timer() being "a writer", while free_ret_instance() being "a reader". If, after we unlink return instance from utask->return_instances list, we know that ri_timer() hasn't gotten to processing utask->return_instances yet, then we can be sure that immediate return_instance reuse is OK, and so we put it onto utask->ri_pool for future (potentially, almost immediate) reuse. This change shows improvements both in single CPU performance (by avoiding relatively expensive kmalloc/free combon) and in terms of multi-CPU scalability, where you can see that per-CPU throughput doesn't decline as steeply with increased number of CPUs (which were previously attributed to kmalloc()/free() through profiling): BASELINE (latest perf/core) =========================== uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 1.898 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.898M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 3.574 ± 0.011M/s ( 1.787M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 3 cpus): 5.279 ± 0.066M/s ( 1.760M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 6.824 ± 0.047M/s ( 1.706M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 5 cpus): 8.339 ± 0.060M/s ( 1.668M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 6 cpus): 9.812 ± 0.047M/s ( 1.635M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 7 cpus): 11.030 ± 0.048M/s ( 1.576M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 12.453 ± 0.126M/s ( 1.557M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (10 cpus): 14.838 ± 0.044M/s ( 1.484M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (12 cpus): 17.092 ± 0.115M/s ( 1.424M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (14 cpus): 19.576 ± 0.022M/s ( 1.398M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 22.264 ± 0.015M/s ( 1.391M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (24 cpus): 33.534 ± 0.078M/s ( 1.397M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 43.262 ± 0.127M/s ( 1.352M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (40 cpus): 53.252 ± 0.080M/s ( 1.331M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (48 cpus): 55.778 ± 0.045M/s ( 1.162M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (56 cpus): 56.850 ± 0.227M/s ( 1.015M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 62.005 ± 0.077M/s ( 0.969M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (72 cpus): 66.445 ± 0.236M/s ( 0.923M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (80 cpus): 68.353 ± 0.180M/s ( 0.854M/s/cpu) THIS PATCHSET (on top of latest perf/core) ========================================== uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 2.253 ± 0.004M/s ( 2.253M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 4.281 ± 0.003M/s ( 2.140M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 3 cpus): 6.389 ± 0.027M/s ( 2.130M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 8.328 ± 0.005M/s ( 2.082M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 5 cpus): 10.353 ± 0.001M/s ( 2.071M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 6 cpus): 12.513 ± 0.010M/s ( 2.086M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 7 cpus): 14.525 ± 0.017M/s ( 2.075M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 15.633 ± 0.013M/s ( 1.954M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (10 cpus): 19.532 ± 0.011M/s ( 1.953M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (12 cpus): 21.405 ± 0.009M/s ( 1.784M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (14 cpus): 24.857 ± 0.020M/s ( 1.776M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 26.466 ± 0.018M/s ( 1.654M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (24 cpus): 40.513 ± 0.222M/s ( 1.688M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 54.180 ± 0.074M/s ( 1.693M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (40 cpus): 66.100 ± 0.082M/s ( 1.652M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (48 cpus): 70.544 ± 0.068M/s ( 1.470M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (56 cpus): 74.494 ± 0.055M/s ( 1.330M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 79.317 ± 0.029M/s ( 1.239M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (72 cpus): 84.875 ± 0.020M/s ( 1.179M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (80 cpus): 92.318 ± 0.224M/s ( 1.154M/s/cpu) For reference, with uprobe-nop we hit the following throughput: uprobe-nop (80 cpus): 143.485 ± 0.035M/s ( 1.794M/s/cpu) So now uretprobe stays a bit closer to that performance. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206002417.3295533-5-andrii@kernel.org
2024-12-09uprobes: Simplify session consumer trackingAndrii Nakryiko1-2/+8
In practice, each return_instance will typically contain either zero or one return_consumer, depending on whether it has any uprobe session consumer attached or not. It's highly unlikely that more than one uprobe session consumers will be attached to any given uprobe, so there is no need to optimize for that case. But the way we currently do memory allocation and accounting is by pre-allocating the space for 4 session consumers in contiguous block of memory next to struct return_instance fixed part. This is unnecessarily wasteful. This patch changes this to keep struct return_instance fixed-sized with one pre-allocated return_consumer, while (in a highly unlikely scenario) allowing for more session consumers in a separate dynamically allocated and reallocated array. We also simplify accounting a bit by not maintaining a separate temporary capacity for consumers array, and, instead, relying on krealloc() to be a no-op if underlying memory can accommodate a slightly bigger allocation (but again, it's very uncommon scenario to even have to do this reallocation). All this gets rid of ri_size(), simplifies push_consumer() and removes confusing ri->consumers_cnt re-assignment, while containing this singular preallocated consumer logic contained within a few simple preexisting helpers. Having fixed-sized struct return_instance simplifies and speeds up return_instance reuse that we ultimately add later in this patch set, see follow up patches. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206002417.3295533-2-andrii@kernel.org
2024-11-11uprobes: Re-order struct uprobe_task to save some spaceChristophe JAILLET1-3/+3
On x86_64, with allmodconfig, struct uprobe_task is 72 bytes long, with a hole and some padding. /* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 7 */ /* sum members: 64, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */ /* padding: 4 */ /* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 4 */ /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */ Reorder the structure to fill the hole and avoid the padding. This way, the whole structure fits in a single cacheline and some memory is saved when it is allocated. /* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */ /* forced alignments: 1 */ Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a9f541d0cedf421f765c77a1fb93d6a979778a88.1730495562.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
2024-10-31uprobes: SRCU-protect uretprobe lifetime (with timeout)Andrii Nakryiko1-2/+52
Avoid taking refcount on uprobe in prepare_uretprobe(), instead take uretprobe-specific SRCU lock and keep it active as kernel transfers control back to user space. Given we can't rely on user space returning from traced function within reasonable time period, we need to make sure not to keep SRCU lock active for too long, though. To that effect, we employ a timer callback which is meant to terminate SRCU lock region after predefined timeout (currently set to 100ms), and instead transfer underlying struct uprobe's lifetime protection to refcounting. This fallback to less scalable refcounting after 100ms is a fine tradeoff from uretprobe's scalability and performance perspective, because uretprobing *long running* user functions inherently doesn't run into scalability issues (there is just not enough frequency to cause noticeable issues with either performance or scalability). The overall trick is in ensuring synchronization between current thread and timer's callback fired on some other thread. To cope with that with minimal logic complications, we add hprobe wrapper which is used to contain all the synchronization related issues behind a small number of basic helpers: hprobe_expire() for "downgrading" uprobe from SRCU-protected state to refcounted state, and a hprobe_consume() and hprobe_finalize() pair of single-use consuming helpers. Other than that, whatever current thread's logic is there stays the same, as timer thread cannot modify return_instance state (or add new/remove old return_instances). It only takes care of SRCU unlock and uprobe refcounting, which is hidden from the higher-level uretprobe handling logic. We use atomic xchg() in hprobe_consume(), which is called from performance critical handle_uretprobe_chain() function run in the current context. When uncontended, this xchg() doesn't seem to hurt performance as there are no other competing CPUs fighting for the same cache line. We also mark struct return_instance as ____cacheline_aligned to ensure no false sharing can happen. Another technical moment. We need to make sure that the list of return instances can be safely traversed under RCU from timer callback, so we delay return_instance freeing with kfree_rcu() and make sure that list modifications use RCU-aware operations. Also, given SRCU lock survives transition from kernel to user space and back we need to use lower-level __srcu_read_lock() and __srcu_read_unlock() to avoid lockdep complaining. Just to give an impression of a kind of performance improvements this change brings, below are benchmarking results with and without these SRCU changes, assuming other uprobe optimizations (mainly RCU Tasks Trace for entry uprobes, lockless RB-tree lookup, and lockless VMA to uprobe lookup) are left intact: WITHOUT SRCU for uretprobes =========================== uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 2.197 ± 0.002M/s ( 2.197M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 3.325 ± 0.001M/s ( 1.662M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 3 cpus): 4.129 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.376M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 6.180 ± 0.003M/s ( 1.545M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 7.323 ± 0.005M/s ( 0.915M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 6.943 ± 0.005M/s ( 0.434M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 5.931 ± 0.014M/s ( 0.185M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 5.145 ± 0.003M/s ( 0.080M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (80 cpus): 4.925 ± 0.005M/s ( 0.062M/s/cpu) WITH SRCU for uretprobes ======================== uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 1.968 ± 0.001M/s ( 1.968M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 3.739 ± 0.003M/s ( 1.869M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 3 cpus): 5.616 ± 0.003M/s ( 1.872M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 7.286 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.822M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 13.657 ± 0.007M/s ( 1.707M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 45.305 ± 0.066M/s ( 1.416M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 42.390 ± 0.922M/s ( 0.662M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (80 cpus): 47.554 ± 2.411M/s ( 0.594M/s/cpu) Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024044159.3156646-3-andrii@kernel.org
2024-10-23uprobe: Add support for session consumerJiri Olsa1-1/+20
This change allows the uprobe consumer to behave as session which means that 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks are connected in a way that allows to: - control execution of 'ret_handler' from 'handler' callback - share data between 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks The session concept fits to our common use case where we do filtering on entry uprobe and based on the result we decide to run the return uprobe (or not). It's also convenient to share the data between session callbacks. To achive this we are adding new return value the uprobe consumer can return from 'handler' callback: UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE - Ignore 'ret_handler' callback for this consumer. And store cookie and pass it to 'ret_handler' when consumer has both 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks defined. We store shared data in the return_consumer object array as part of the return_instance object. This way the handle_uretprobe_chain can find related return_consumer and its shared data. We also store entry handler return value, for cases when there are multiple consumers on single uprobe and some of them are ignored and some of them not, in which case the return probe gets installed and we need to have a way to find out which consumer needs to be ignored. The tricky part is when consumer is registered 'after' the uprobe entry handler is hit. In such case this consumer's 'ret_handler' gets executed as well, but it won't have the proper data pointer set, so we can filter it out. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241018202252.693462-3-jolsa@kernel.org
2024-10-23uprobe: Add data pointer to consumer handlersJiri Olsa1-2/+2
Adding data pointer to both entry and exit consumer handlers and all its users. The functionality itself is coming in following change. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241018202252.693462-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2024-09-05perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister()Peter Zijlstra1-2/+6
With uprobe_unregister() having grown a synchronize_srcu(), it becomes fairly slow to call. Esp. since both users of this API call it in a loop. Peel off the sync_srcu() and do it once, after the loop. We also need to add uprobe_unregister_sync() into uprobe_register()'s error handling path, as we need to be careful about returning to the caller before we have a guarantee that partially attached consumer won't be called anymore. This is an unlikely slow path and this should be totally fine to be slow in the case of a failed attach. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240903174603.3554182-6-andrii@kernel.org
2024-09-05uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU protectionAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+9
uprobe->register_rwsem is one of a few big bottlenecks to scalability of uprobes, so we need to get rid of it to improve uprobe performance and multi-CPU scalability. First, we turn uprobe's consumer list to a typical doubly-linked list and utilize existing RCU-aware helpers for traversing such lists, as well as adding and removing elements from it. For entry uprobes we already have SRCU protection active since before uprobe lookup. For uretprobe we keep refcount, guaranteeing that uprobe won't go away from under us, but we add SRCU protection around consumer list traversal. Lastly, to keep handler_chain()'s UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE handling simple, we remember whether any removal was requested during handler calls, but then we double-check the decision under a proper register_rwsem using consumers' filter callbacks. Handler removal is very rare, so this extra lock won't hurt performance, overall, but we also avoid the need for any extra protection (e.g., seqcount locks). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240903174603.3554182-5-andrii@kernel.org
2024-09-05uprobes: get rid of enum uprobe_filter_ctx in uprobe filter callbacksAndrii Nakryiko1-9/+1
It serves no purpose beyond adding unnecessray argument passed to the filter callback. Just get rid of it, no one is actually using it. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240903174603.3554182-4-andrii@kernel.org
2024-08-02uprobes: make uprobe_register() return struct uprobe *Oleg Nesterov1-7/+8
This way uprobe_unregister() and uprobe_apply() can use "struct uprobe *" rather than inode + offset. This simplifies the code and allows to avoid the unnecessary find_uprobe() + put_uprobe() in these functions. TODO: uprobe_unregister() still needs get_uprobe/put_uprobe to ensure that this uprobe can't be freed before up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem). Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801132734.GA8803@redhat.com
2024-08-02uprobes: kill uprobe_register_refctr()Oleg Nesterov1-7/+2
It doesn't make any sense to have 2 versions of _register(). Note that trace_uprobe_enable(), the only user of uprobe_register(), doesn't need to check tu->ref_ctr_offset to decide which one should be used, it could safely pass ref_ctr_offset == 0 to uprobe_register_refctr(). Add this argument to uprobe_register(), update the callers, and kill uprobe_register_refctr(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801132728.GA8800@redhat.com
2024-08-02perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobeAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+2
When tracing user functions with uprobe functionality, it's common to install the probe (e.g., a BPF program) at the first instruction of the function. This is often going to be `push %rbp` instruction in function preamble, which means that within that function frame pointer hasn't been established yet. This leads to consistently missing an actual caller of the traced function, because perf_callchain_user() only records current IP (capturing traced function) and then following frame pointer chain (which would be caller's frame, containing the address of caller's caller). So when we have target_1 -> target_2 -> target_3 call chain and we are tracing an entry to target_3, captured stack trace will report target_1 -> target_3 call chain, which is wrong and confusing. This patch proposes a x86-64-specific heuristic to detect `push %rbp` (`push %ebp` on 32-bit architecture) instruction being traced. Given entire kernel implementation of user space stack trace capturing works under assumption that user space code was compiled with frame pointer register (%rbp/%ebp) preservation, it seems pretty reasonable to use this instruction as a strong indicator that this is the entry to the function. In that case, return address is still pointed to by %rsp/%esp, so we fetch it and add to stack trace before proceeding to unwind the rest using frame pointer-based logic. We also check for `endbr64` (for 64-bit modes) as another common pattern for function entry, as suggested by Josh Poimboeuf. Even if we get this wrong sometimes for uprobes attached not at the function entry, it's OK because stack trace will still be overall meaningful, just with one extra bogus entry. If we don't detect this, we end up with guaranteed to be missing caller function entry in the stack trace, which is worse overall. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240729175223.23914-1-andrii@kernel.org
2024-06-12uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probeJiri Olsa1-0/+3
Adding uretprobe syscall instead of trap to speed up return probe. At the moment the uretprobe setup/path is: - install entry uprobe - when the uprobe is hit, it overwrites probed function's return address on stack with address of the trampoline that contains breakpoint instruction - the breakpoint trap code handles the uretprobe consumers execution and jumps back to original return address This patch replaces the above trampoline's breakpoint instruction with new ureprobe syscall call. This syscall does exactly the same job as the trap with some more extra work: - syscall trampoline must save original value for rax/r11/rcx registers on stack - rax is set to syscall number and r11/rcx are changed and used by syscall instruction - the syscall code reads the original values of those registers and restore those values in task's pt_regs area - only caller from trampoline exposed in '[uprobes]' is allowed, the process will receive SIGILL signal otherwise Even with some extra work, using the uretprobes syscall shows speed improvement (compared to using standard breakpoint): On Intel (11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz) current: uretprobe-nop : 1.498 ± 0.000M/s uretprobe-push : 1.448 ± 0.001M/s uretprobe-ret : 0.816 ± 0.001M/s with the fix: uretprobe-nop : 1.969 ± 0.002M/s < 31% speed up uretprobe-push : 1.910 ± 0.000M/s < 31% speed up uretprobe-ret : 0.934 ± 0.000M/s < 14% speed up On Amd (AMD Ryzen 7 5700U) current: uretprobe-nop : 0.778 ± 0.001M/s uretprobe-push : 0.744 ± 0.001M/s uretprobe-ret : 0.540 ± 0.001M/s with the fix: uretprobe-nop : 0.860 ± 0.001M/s < 10% speed up uretprobe-push : 0.818 ± 0.001M/s < 10% speed up uretprobe-ret : 0.578 ± 0.000M/s < 7% speed up The performance test spawns a thread that runs loop which triggers uprobe with attached bpf program that increments the counter that gets printed in results above. The uprobe (and uretprobe) kind is determined by which instruction is being patched with breakpoint instruction. That's also important for uretprobes, because uprobe is installed for each uretprobe. The performance test is part of bpf selftests: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/run_bench_uprobes.sh Note at the moment uretprobe syscall is supported only for native 64-bit process, compat process still uses standard breakpoint. Note that when shadow stack is enabled the uretprobe syscall returns via iret, which is slower than return via sysret, but won't cause the shadow stack violation. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-4-jolsa@kernel.org/ Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 156Thomas Gleixner1-14/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not write to the free software foundation inc 59 temple place suite 330 boston ma 02111 1307 usa extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1334 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.113240726@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-04-30uprobes: Initialize uprobes earlierNadav Amit1-0/+5
In order to have a separate address space for text poking, we need to duplicate init_mm early during start_kernel(). This, however, introduces a problem since uprobes functions are called from dup_mmap(), but uprobes is still not initialized in this early stage. Since uprobes initialization is necassary for fork, and since all the dependant initialization has been done when fork is initialized (percpu and vmalloc), move uprobes initialization to fork_init(). It does not seem uprobes introduces any security problem for the poking_mm. Crash and burn if uprobes initialization fails, similarly to other early initializations. Change the init_probes() name to probes_init() to match other early initialization functions name convention. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Cc: deneen.t.dock@intel.com Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: kristen@linux.intel.com Cc: linux_dti@icloud.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190426232303.28381-6-nadav.amit@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-09-24uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore)Ravi Bangoria1-0/+5
Userspace Statically Defined Tracepoints[1] are dtrace style markers inside userspace applications. Applications like PostgreSQL, MySQL, Pthread, Perl, Python, Java, Ruby, Node.js, libvirt, QEMU, glib etc have these markers embedded in them. These markers are added by developer at important places in the code. Each marker source expands to a single nop instruction in the compiled code but there may be additional overhead for computing the marker arguments which expands to couple of instructions. In case the overhead is more, execution of it can be omitted by runtime if() condition when no one is tracing on the marker: if (reference_counter > 0) { Execute marker instructions; } Default value of reference counter is 0. Tracer has to increment the reference counter before tracing on a marker and decrement it when done with the tracing. Implement the reference counter logic in core uprobe. User will be able to use it from trace_uprobe as well as from kernel module. New trace_uprobe definition with reference counter will now be: <path>:<offset>[(ref_ctr_offset)] where ref_ctr_offset is an optional field. For kernel module, new variant of uprobe_register() has been introduced: uprobe_register_refctr(inode, offset, ref_ctr_offset, consumer) No new variant for uprobe_unregister() because it's assumed to have only one reference counter for one uprobe. [1] https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation Note: 'reference counter' is called as 'semaphore' in original Dtrace (or Systemtap, bcc and even in ELF) documentation and code. But the term 'semaphore' is misleading in this context. This is just a counter used to hold number of tracers tracing on a marker. This is not really used for any synchronization. So we are calling it a 'reference counter' in kernel / perf code. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180820044250.11659-2-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> [Only trace_uprobe.c] Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-08-14Uprobe: Additional argument arch_uprobe to uprobe_write_opcode()Ravi Bangoria1-1/+1
Add addition argument 'arch_uprobe' to uprobe_write_opcode(). We need this in later set of patches. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180809041856.1547-3-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2016-12-12sparc64:Support User Probes for sparcAllen Pais1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Eric Saint Etienne <eric.saint.etienne@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.pais@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-11-23treewide: Remove old email addressPeter Zijlstra1-1/+1
There were still a number of references to my old Red Hat email address in the kernel source. Remove these while keeping the Red Hat copyright notices intact. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-31uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more cleverOleg Nesterov1-0/+1
The previous change documents that cleanup_return_instances() can't always detect the dead frames, the stack can grow. But there is one special case which imho worth fixing: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() can return true when the stack didn't actually grow, but the next "call" insn uses the already invalidated frame. Test-case: #include <stdio.h> #include <setjmp.h> jmp_buf jmp; int nr = 1024; void func_2(void) { if (--nr == 0) return; longjmp(jmp, 1); } void func_1(void) { setjmp(jmp); func_2(); } int main(void) { func_1(); return 0; } If you ret-probe func_1() and func_2() prepare_uretprobe() hits the MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH limit and "return" from func_2() is not reported. When we know that the new call is not chained, we can do the more strict check. In this case "sp" points to the new ret-addr, so every frame which uses the same "sp" must be dead. The only complication is that arch_uretprobe_is_alive() needs to know was it chained or not, so we add the new RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL enum and change prepare_uretprobe() to pass RP_CHECK_CALL only if !chained. Note: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() could also re-read *sp and check if this word is still trampoline_vaddr. This could obviously improve the logic, but I would like to avoid another copy_from_user() especially in the case when we can't avoid the false "alive == T" positives. Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150721134028.GA4786@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-31uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive()Oleg Nesterov1-1/+6
arch/x86 doesn't care (so far), but as Pratyush Anand pointed out other architectures might want why arch_uretprobe_is_alive() was called and use different checks depending on the context. Add the new argument to distinguish 2 callers. Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150721134026.GA4779@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-31uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive()Oleg Nesterov1-0/+1
Add the x86 specific version of arch_uretprobe_is_alive() helper. It returns true if the stack frame mangled by prepare_uretprobe() is still on stack. So if it returns false, we know that the probed function has already returned. We add the new return_instance->stack member and change the generic code to initialize it in prepare_uretprobe, but it should be equally useful for other architectures. TODO: this assumes that the probed application can't use multiple stacks (say sigaltstack). We will try to improve this logic later. Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150721134018.GA4766@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-31uprobes: Export 'struct return_instance', introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive()Oleg Nesterov1-0/+10
Add the new "weak" helper, arch_uretprobe_is_alive(), used by the next patches. It should return true if this return_instance is still valid. The arch agnostic version just always returns true. The patch exports "struct return_instance" for the architectures which want to override this hook. We can also cleanup prepare_uretprobe() if we pass the new return_instance to arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(). Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150721134016.GA4762@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-10-23uprobes: Remove "weak" from function declarationsBjorn Helgaas1-7/+7
For the following interfaces: set_swbp() set_orig_insn() is_swbp_insn() is_trap_insn() uprobe_get_swbp_addr() arch_uprobe_ignore() arch_uprobe_copy_ixol() kernel/events/uprobes.c provides default definitions explicitly marked "weak". Some architectures provide their own definitions intended to override the defaults, but the "weak" attribute on the declarations applied to the arch definitions as well, so the linker chose one based on link order (see 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node decl")). Remove the "weak" attribute from the declarations so we always prefer a non-weak definition over the weak one, independent of link order. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> CC: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org> CC: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
2014-06-13Merge branch 'perf-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+4
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull more perf updates from Ingo Molnar: "A second round of perf updates: - wide reaching kprobes sanitization and robustization, with the hope of fixing all 'probe this function crashes the kernel' bugs, by Masami Hiramatsu. - uprobes updates from Oleg Nesterov: tmpfs support, corner case fixes and robustization work. - perf tooling updates and fixes from Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Ki, Arnaldo et al: * Add support to accumulate hist periods (Namhyung Kim) * various fixes, refactorings and enhancements" * 'perf-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (101 commits) perf: Differentiate exec() and non-exec() comm events perf: Fix perf_event_comm() vs. exec() assumption uprobes/x86: Rename arch_uprobe->def to ->defparam, minor comment updates perf/documentation: Add description for conditional branch filter perf/x86: Add conditional branch filtering support perf/tool: Add conditional branch filter 'cond' to perf record perf: Add new conditional branch filter 'PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND' uprobes: Teach copy_insn() to support tmpfs uprobes: Shift ->readpage check from __copy_insn() to uprobe_register() perf/x86: Use common PMU interrupt disabled code perf/ARM: Use common PMU interrupt disabled code perf: Disable sampled events if no PMU interrupt perf: Fix use after free in perf_remove_from_context() perf tools: Fix 'make help' message error perf record: Fix poll return value propagation perf tools: Move elide bool into perf_hpp_fmt struct perf tools: Remove elide setup for SORT_MODE__MEMORY mode perf tools: Fix "==" into "=" in ui_browser__warning assignment perf tools: Allow overriding sysfs and proc finding with env var perf tools: Consider header files outside perf directory in tags target ...
2014-05-26ARM: 8043/1: uprobes need icache flush after xol writeVictor Kamensky1-0/+3
After instruction write into xol area, on ARM V7 architecture code need to flush dcache and icache to sync them up for given set of addresses. Having just 'flush_dcache_page(page)' call is not enough - it is possible to have stale instruction sitting in icache for given xol area slot address. Introduce arch_uprobe_ixol_copy weak function that by default calls uprobes copy_to_page function and than flush_dcache_page function and on ARM define new one that handles xol slot copy in ARM specific way flush_uprobe_xol_access function shares/reuses implementation with/of flush_ptrace_access function and takes care of writing instruction to user land address space on given variety of different cache types on ARM CPUs. Because flush_uprobe_xol_access does not have vma around flush_ptrace_access was split into two parts. First that retrieves set of condition from vma and common that receives those conditions as flags. Note ARM cache flush function need kernel address through which instruction write happened, so instead of using uprobes copy_to_page function changed code to explicitly map page and do memcpy. Note arch_uprobe_copy_ixol function, in similar way as copy_to_user_page function, has preempt_disable/preempt_enable. Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2014-05-14uprobes/x86: Fix the wrong ->si_addr when xol triggers a trapOleg Nesterov1-0/+4
If the probed insn triggers a trap, ->si_addr = regs->ip is technically correct, but this is not what the signal handler wants; we need to pass the address of the probed insn, not the address of xol slot. Add the new arch-agnostic helper, uprobe_get_trap_addr(), and change fill_trap_info() and math_error() to use it. !CONFIG_UPROBES case in uprobes.h uses a macro to avoid include hell and ensure that it can be compiled even if an architecture doesn't define instruction_pointer(). Test-case: #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> extern void probe_div(void); void sigh(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *c) { int passed = (info->si_addr == probe_div); printf(passed ? "PASS\n" : "FAIL\n"); _exit(!passed); } int main(void) { struct sigaction sa = { .sa_sigaction = sigh, .sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO, }; sigaction(SIGFPE, &sa, NULL); asm ( "xor %ecx,%ecx\n" ".globl probe_div; probe_div:\n" "idiv %ecx\n" ); return 0; } it fails if probe_div() is probed. Note: show_unhandled_signals users should probably use this helper too, but we need to cleanup them first. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
2014-03-19uprobes: allow ignoring of probe hitsDavid A. Long1-0/+1
Allow arches to decided to ignore a probe hit. ARM will use this to only call handlers if the conditions to execute a conditionally executed instruction are satisfied. Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-11-20uprobes: Cleanup !CONFIG_UPROBES decls, unexport xol_areaOleg Nesterov1-27/+4
1. Don't include asm/uprobes.h unconditionally, we only need it if CONFIG_UPROBES. 2. Move the definition of "struct xol_area" into uprobes.c. Perhaps we should simply kill struct uprobes_state, it buys nothing. 3. Kill the dummy definition of uprobe_get_swbp_addr(), nobody except handle_swbp() needs it. 4. Purely cosmetic, but move the decl of uprobe_get_swbp_addr() up, close to other __weak helpers. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2013-11-20uprobes: Add uprobe_task->dup_xol_work/dup_xol_addrOleg Nesterov1-5/+16
uprobe_task->vaddr is a bit strange. The generic code uses it only to pass the additional argument to arch_uprobe_pre_xol(), and since it is always equal to instruction_pointer() this looks even more strange. And both utask->vaddr and and utask->autask have the same scope, they only have the meaning when the task executes the probed insn out-of-line, so it is safe to reuse both in UTASK_RUNNING state. This all means that logically ->vaddr belongs to arch_uprobe_task and we should probably move it there, arch_uprobe_pre_xol() can record instruction_pointer() itself. OTOH, it is also used by uprobe_copy_process() and dup_xol_work() for another purpose, this doesn't look clean and doesn't allow to move this member into arch_uprobe_task. This patch adds the union with 2 anonymous structs into uprobe_task. The first struct is autask + vaddr, this way we "almost" move vaddr into autask. The second struct has 2 new members for uprobe_copy_process() paths: ->dup_xol_addr which can be used instead ->vaddr, and ->dup_xol_work which can be used to avoid kmalloc() and simplify the code. Note that this union will likely have another member(s), we need something like "private_data_for_handlers" so that the tracing handlers could use it to communicate with call_fetch() methods. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2013-11-06uprobes: Export write_opcode() as uprobe_write_opcode()Oleg Nesterov1-0/+1
set_swbp() and set_orig_insn() are __weak, but this is pointless because write_opcode() is static. Export write_opcode() as uprobe_write_opcode() for the upcoming arm port, this way it can actually override set_swbp() and use __opcode_to_mem_arm(bpinsn) instead if UPROBE_SWBP_INSN. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-11-06uprobes: Move function declarations out of archDavid A. Long1-0/+8
Move the function declarations from the arch headers to the common header, since only the function bodies are architecture-specific. These changes are from Vincent Rabin's uprobes patch. [ oleg: update arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h ] Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-10-29uprobes: Teach uprobe_copy_process() to handle CLONE_VFORKOleg Nesterov1-2/+2
uprobe_copy_process() does nothing if the child shares ->mm with the forking process, but there is a special case: CLONE_VFORK. In this case it would be more correct to do dup_utask() but avoid dup_xol(). This is not that important, the child should not unwind its stack too much, this can corrupt the parent's stack, but at least we need this to allow to ret-probe __vfork() itself. Note: in theory, it would be better to check task_pt_regs(p)->sp instead of CLONE_VFORK, we need to dup_utask() if and only if the child can return from the function called by the parent. But this needs the arch-dependant helper, and I think that nobody actually does clone(same_stack, CLONE_VM). Reported-by: Martin Cermak <mcermak@redhat.com> Reported-by: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-10-29uprobes: Remove the wrong __weak attributeRalf Baechle1-1/+1
linux/uprobes.h declares arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() as a weak function. But as there is no definition of generic version so when trying to build uprobes for an architecture that doesn't yet have a arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() implementation, the vmlinux will try to call arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() somehwere in Stupidhistan leading to a system crash. We rather want a proper link error so remove arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(). Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-13uretprobes: Limit the depth of return probe nestednessAnton Arapov1-0/+3
Unlike the kretprobes we can't trust userspace, thus must have protection from user space attacks. User-space have "unlimited" stack, and this patch limits the return probes nestedness as a simple remedy for it. Note that this implementation leaks return_instance on siglongjmp until exit()/exec(). The intention is to have KISS and bare minimum solution for the initial implementation in order to not complicate the uretprobes code. In the future we may come up with more sophisticated solution that remove this depth limitation. It is not easy task and lays beyond this patchset. Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-13uretprobes: Return probe entry, prepare_uretprobe()Anton Arapov1-0/+1
When a uprobe with return probe consumer is hit, prepare_uretprobe() function is invoked. It creates return_instance, hijacks return address and replaces it with the trampoline. * Return instances are kept as stack per uprobed task. * Return instance is chained, when the original return address is trampoline's page vaddr (e.g. recursive call of the probed function). Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-13uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer->ret_handler()Anton Arapov1-0/+3
Enclose return probes implementation, introduce ->ret_handler() and update existing code to rely on ->handler() *and* ->ret_handler() for uprobe and uretprobe respectively. Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-04uprobes: Add trap variant helperAnanth N Mavinakayanahalli1-0/+1
Some architectures like powerpc have multiple variants of the trap instruction. Introduce an additional helper is_trap_insn() for run-time handling of non-uprobe traps on such architectures. While there, change is_swbp_at_addr() to is_trap_at_addr() for reading clarity. With this change, the uprobe registration path will supercede any trap instruction inserted at the requested location, while taking care of delivering the SIGTRAP for cases where the trap notification came in for an address without a uprobe. See [1] for a more detailed explanation. [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-March/104771.html This change was suggested by Oleg Nesterov. Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-02-08uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply()Oleg Nesterov1-0/+6
Currently it is not possible to change the filtering constraints after uprobe_register(), so a consumer can not, say, start to trace a task/mm which was previously filtered out, or remove the no longer needed bp's. Introduce uprobe_apply() which simply does register_for_each_vma() again to consult uprobe_consumer->filter() and install/remove the breakpoints. The only complication is that register_for_each_vma() can no longer assume that uprobe->consumers should be consulter if is_register == T, so we change it to accept "struct uprobe_consumer *new" instead. Unlike uprobe_register(), uprobe_apply(true) doesn't do "unregister" if register_for_each_vma() fails, it is up to caller to handle the error. Note: we probably need to cleanup the current interface, it is strange that uprobe_apply/unregister need inode/offset. We should either change uprobe_register() to return "struct uprobe *", or add a private ->uprobe member in uprobe_consumer. And in the long term uprobe_apply() should take a single argument, uprobe or consumer, even "bool add" should go away. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-02-08uprobes: Teach handler_chain() to filter out the probed taskOleg Nesterov1-0/+3
Currrently the are 2 problems with pre-filtering: 1. It is not possible to add/remove a task (mm) after uprobe_register() 2. A forked child inherits all breakpoints and uprobe_consumer can not control this. This patch does the first step to improve the filtering. handler_chain() removes the breakpoints installed by this uprobe from current->mm if all handlers return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE. Note that handler_chain() relies on ->register_rwsem to avoid the race with uprobe_register/unregister which can add/del a consumer, or even remove and then insert the new uprobe at the same address. Perhaps we will add uprobe_apply_mm(uprobe, mm, is_register) and teach copy_mm() to do filter(UPROBE_FILTER_FORK), but I think this change makes sense anyway. Note: instead of checking the retcode from uc->handler, we could add uc->filter(UPROBE_FILTER_BPHIT). But I think this is not optimal to call 2 hooks in a row. This buys nothing, and if handler/filter do something nontrivial they will probably do the same work twice. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2013-02-08uprobes: Reintroduce uprobe_consumer->filter()Oleg Nesterov1-0/+9
Finally add uprobe_consumer->filter() and change consumer_filter() to actually call this method. Note that ->filter() accepts mm_struct, not task_struct. Because: 1. We do not have for_each_mm_user(mm, task). 2. Even if we implement for_each_mm_user(), ->filter() can use it itself. 3. It is not clear who will actually need this interface to do the "nontrivial" filtering. Another argument is "enum uprobe_filter_ctx", consumer->filter() can use it to figure out why/where it was called. For example, perhaps we can add UPROBE_FILTER_PRE_REGISTER used by build_map_info() to quickly "nack" the unwanted mm's. In this case consumer should know that it is called under ->i_mmap_mutex. See the previous discussion at http://marc.info/?t=135214229700002 Perhaps we should pass more arguments, vma/vaddr? Note: this patch obviously can't help to filter out the child created by fork(), this will be addressed later. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2013-02-08uprobes: Kill uprobe_consumer->filter()Oleg Nesterov1-5/+0
uprobe_consumer->filter() is pointless in its current form, kill it. We will add it back, but with the different signature/semantics. Perhaps we will even re-introduce the callsite in handler_chain(), but not to just skip uc->handler(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-11-16uprobes: Use percpu_rw_semaphore to fix register/unregister vs dup_mmap() raceOleg Nesterov1-0/+8
This was always racy, but 268720903f87e0b84b161626c4447b81671b5d18 "uprobes: Rework register_for_each_vma() to make it O(n)" should be blamed anyway, it made everything worse and I didn't notice. register/unregister call build_map_info() and then do install/remove breakpoint for every mm which mmaps inode/offset. This can obviously race with fork()->dup_mmap() in between and we can miss the child. uprobe_register() could be easily fixed but unregister is much worse, the new mm inherits "int3" from parent and there is no way to detect this if uprobe goes away. So this patch simply adds percpu_down_read/up_read around dup_mmap(), and percpu_down_write/up_write into register_for_each_vma(). This adds 2 new hooks into dup_mmap() but we can kill uprobe_dup_mmap() and fold it into uprobe_end_dup_mmap(). Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2012-11-03uprobes: Kill arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() hooksOleg Nesterov1-2/+0
Kill arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() hooks, they do nothing and nobody needs them. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-10-07uprobes: Introduce prepare_uprobe()Oleg Nesterov1-10/+0
Preparation. Extract the copy_insn/arch_uprobe_analyze_insn code from install_breakpoint() into the new helper, prepare_uprobe(). And move uprobe->flags defines from uprobes.h to uprobes.c, nobody else can use them anyway. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-09-29uprobes: Kill UTASK_BP_HIT stateOleg Nesterov1-1/+0
Kill UTASK_BP_HIT state, it buys nothing but complicates the code. It is only used in uprobe_notify_resume() to decide who should be called, we can check utask->active_uprobe != NULL instead. And this allows us to simplify handle_swbp(), no need to clear utask->state. Likewise we could kill UTASK_SSTEP, but UTASK_BP_HIT is worse and imho should die. The problem is, it creates the special case when task->utask is NULL, we can't distinguish RUNNING and BP_HIT. With this patch utask == NULL always means RUNNING. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-09-15uprobes: Introduce arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step()Sebastian Andrzej Siewior1-0/+2
As Oleg pointed out in [0] uprobe should not use the ptrace interface for enabling/disabling single stepping. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120730141638.GA5306@redhat.com Add the new "__weak arch" helpers which simply call user_*_single_step() as a preparation. This is only needed to not break the powerpc port, we will fold this logic into arch_uprobe_pre/post_xol() hooks later. We should also change handle_singlestep(), _disable_step(&uprobe->arch) should be called before put_uprobe(). Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-08-28uprobes: Remove "verify" argument from set_orig_insn()Oleg Nesterov1-1/+1
Nobody does set_orig_insn(verify => false), and I think nobody will. Remove this argument. IIUC set_orig_insn(verify => false) was needed to single-step without xol area. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-08-28uprobes: Fold uprobe_reset_state() into uprobe_dup_mmap()Oleg Nesterov1-4/+0
Now that we have uprobe_dup_mmap() we can fold uprobe_reset_state() into the new hook and remove it. mmput()->uprobe_clear_state() can't be called before dup_mmap(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-08-28uprobes: Introduce MMF_HAS_UPROBESOleg Nesterov1-0/+5
Add the new MMF_HAS_UPROBES flag. It is set by install_breakpoint() and it is copied by dup_mmap(), uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() checks it to avoid the slow path if the task was never probed. Perhaps it makes sense to check it in valid_vma(is_register => false) as well. This needs the new dup_mmap()->uprobe_dup_mmap() hook. We can't use uprobe_reset_state() or put MMF_HAS_UPROBES into MMF_INIT_MASK, we need oldmm->mmap_sem to avoid the race with uprobe_register() or mmap() from another thread. Currently we never clear this bit, it can be false-positive after uprobe_unregister() or uprobe_munmap() or if dup_mmap() hits the probed VM_DONTCOPY vma. But this is fine correctness-wise and has no effect unless the task hits the non-uprobe breakpoint. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>