| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
There's a mismatch on API: while xe_rtp_process_to_sr() processes
entries until an entry without name, the active tracking with
xe_rtp_process_ctx_enable_active_tracking() needs to use the number of
elements. The number of elements is taken everywhere using ARRAY_SIZE(),
but that will have one entry too many. This leads to the following
warning, as reported by lkp:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c: In function 'xe_tuning_dump':
>> include/drm/drm_print.h:228:31: warning: '%s' directive argument is null [-Wformat-overflow=]
228 | drm_printf((printer), "%.*s" fmt, (indent), "\t\t\t\t\tX", ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c:226:17: note: in expansion of macro 'drm_printf_indent'
226 | drm_printf_indent(p, 1, "%s\n", engine_tunings[idx].name);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That's because it will still process the last entry when tracking the
active tunings. The same issue exists in the WAs. Change
xe_rtp_process_to_sr() to also take the number of elements so the empty
entry can be removed and the warning should go away. Fixing on the
active-tracking side would more fragile as the it would need a `- 1`
everywhere and continue to use a different approach for number of
elements.
Aside from the warning, it's a non-issue as there would always be enough
bits allocated and the last entry would never be active since
xe_rtp_process_to_sr() stops on the sentinel.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503021906.P2MwAvyK-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250306-fix-print-warning-v1-1-979c3dc03c0d@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8aa8c2d4214e1771c32101d70740002662d31bb7)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
Now that rtp has OR rules, it's not needed to extend it to process OOB
WAs. Previously if an entry had no name, it was considered as "a set of
rules OR'ed with the last named entry".
Instead of generating new entries, add OR rules. The syntax for
xe_wa_oob.rules remains the same, with xe_gen_wa_oob generating the
slightly different table. Object sizes delta are negligible, but having
just one logic makes it easier to maintain:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 160/-269 (-109)
Function old new delta
__compound_literal 6104 6264 +160
xe_wa_dump 1839 1810 -29
oob_was 816 576 -240
Total: Before=17257, After=17148, chg -0.63%
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-9-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
The OOB WAs use xe_rtp_process(), without passing an sr to save result
of the actions since there are none. They are also executed in a gt-only
context, making it harder to share the implementation. Thus, introduce a
new set of tests to check these RTP entries. The only check that can be
done is if the entry was marked as active.
Before commit fd6797ec50c5 ("drm/xe/rtp: Fix off-by-one when processing
rules") several of these tests were failing: the processing of OR'ed
entries would make the subsequent entry to be inadvertently enabled.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
Those tests check the behavior of xe_rtp_process_to_sr(), so name them
accordingly to allow adding tests for xe_rtp_process() later.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
Enabling active tracking in the rtp context and check for all the tests
the expected entries become active.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
The RTP tests check both the result of processing the RTP entries and
the outcome saved as SR entries. Rename "count" to be explicit about
what's being counted.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
Some workarounds started to depend on different set of conditions where
the action should be applied if any of them match. See e.g.
commit 24d0d98af1c3 ("drm/xe/xe2lpm: Fixup Wa_14020756599"). Add
XE_RTP_MATCH_OR that allows to implement a logical OR for the rules.
Normal precedence applies:
r1, r2, OR, r3
means
(r1 AND r2) OR r3
The check is shortcut as soon as a set of conditions match.
v2: Do not match on empty number of rules-other-than-OR evaluated
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240618050044.324454-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
If none of the rules match, there should be 0 entries in the sr xarray,
so none of them should have a register matching.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240618050044.324454-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Creating one module for each compilation unit to be tested seems
excessive as the number of tests increase. Group them all in a single
kunit test module called xe_test.ko.
The tests requiring the physical device, aka "live" tests, are still
kept in separate modules since they are normally triggered via igt,
and not via kunit.py. After igt is converted, those can be merged in
a single module as well.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231122203147.988021-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
|
|
Replace drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device with xe helper.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231218190629.502-8-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
|
|
Instead of passing as parameter to xe_pci_fake_device_init(), use
test->priv to pass parameters down the call stack. The main advantage is
that then the data is readily available on other functions by using
kunit_get_current_test().
This is a preparation to fix the initialization of fake devices when
they were supposed to be using GMD_ID.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129232807.1499826-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205133954.2089546-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
When built with W=1, the following warnings show up on modpost:
MODPOST drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Module.symvers
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_dma_buf_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_wa_test.o
Add the module description for each of these to fix the warning.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120221904.695630-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
In preparation for re-adding media GT support, switch the primary GT
within the tile to a dynamic allocation.
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Create a new xe_tile structure to begin separating the concept of "tile"
from "GT." A tile is effectively a complete GPU, and a GT is just one
part of that. On platforms like MTL, there's only a single full GPU
(tile) which has its IP blocks provided by two GTs. In contrast, a
"multi-tile" platform like PVC is basically multiple complete GPUs
packed behind a single PCI device.
For now, just create xe_tile as a simple wrapper around xe_gt. The
items in xe_gt that are truly tied to the tile rather than the GT will
be moved in future patches. Support for multiple GTs per tile (i.e.,
the MTL standalone media case) will also be re-introduced in a future
patch.
v2:
- Fix kunit test build
- Move hunk from next patch to use local tile variable rather than
direct xe->tiles[id] accesses. (Lucas)
- Mention compute in kerneldoc. (Rodrigo)
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
The xe_rtp_process() function and xe_rtp_entry depend on the
save-restore struct. In future it will be desired to process rtp rules,
regardless of adding them to a save-restore. Rename the struct and
function so the intent is clear and the name is freed for future uses.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
The selection between hwe and gt is exposed to the outside of rtp, by
the xe_rtp_process() function. However it doesn't make seense from the
caller point of view to pass a hwe and a gt as argument since the gt
should always be the one containing the hwe.
This clarifies the interface by separating the context creation into an
initializer. The initializer then passes the correct value and there
should never be a case with hwe and gt set: when hwe is passed, the gt
is the one containing it. Internally the functions continue receiving
the argument separately.
v2: Leave the device-only context to a separate patch if they are indeed
needed later
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Rename the address field to "addr" rather than "reg" so it's easier to
understand what it is.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230508225322.2692066-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Now that struct xe_reg and struct xe_reg_mcr are types that can be used
by xe, convert more of the driver to use them. Some notes about the
conversions:
- The RTP tables don't need the MASKED flags anymore in the
actions as that information now comes from the register
definition
- There is no need for the _XE_RTP_REG/_XE_RTP_REG_MCR macros
and the register types on RTP infra: that comes from the
register definitions.
- When declaring the RTP entries, there is no need anymore to
undef XE_REG and friends: the RTP macros deal with removing
the cast where needed due to not being able to use a compound
statement for initialization in the tables
- The index in the reg-sr xarray is the register offset only.
Otherwise we wouldn't catch mistakes about adding both a
MCR-style and normal-style registers. For that, the register
is now also part of the entry, so the options can be compared
to check for compatible entries.
In order to be able to accomplish this, some improvements are needed on
the RTP macros. Change its implementation to concentrate on "pasting a prefix
to each argument" rather than the more general "call any macro for each
argument". Hopefully this will avoid trying to extend this infra and
making it more complex. With the use of tuples for building the
arguments, it's not possible to pass additional register fields and
using xe_reg in the RTP tables.
xe_mmio_* still need to be converted, from u32 to xe_reg, but that is
left for another change.
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
These should replace the _MMIO() and MCR_REG() from i915, with the goal
of being more extensible, allowing to pass the additional fields for
struct xe_reg and struct xe_reg_mcr. Replace all uses of _MMIO() and
MCR_REG() in xe.
Since the RTP, reg-save-restore and WA infra are not ready to use the
new type, just undef the macro like was done for the i915 types
previously. That conversion will come later.
v2: Remove MEDIA_SOFT_SCRATCH_COUNT/MEDIA_SOFT_SCRATCH re-added by
mistake (Matt Roper)
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230427223256.1432787-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Add some basic unit tests for rtp. This is intended to prove the
functionality of the rtp itself, like coalescing entries, rejecting
non-disjoint values, etc.
Contrary to the other tests in xe, this is a unit test to test the
sw-side only, so it can be executed on any machine - it doesn't interact
with the real hardware. Running it produces the following output:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output-kunit \
--kunitconfig drivers/gpu/drm/xe/.kunitconfig xe_rtp
...
[01:26:27] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: xe_rtp
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: xe_rtp_process_tests
ok 1 coalesce-same-reg
ok 2 no-match-no-add
ok 3 no-match-no-add-multiple-rules
ok 4 two-regs-two-entries
ok 5 clr-one-set-other
ok 6 set-field
[drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000001, set: 00000001, masked: no): ret=-22
ok 7 conflict-duplicate
[drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000003, set: 00000000, masked: no): ret=-22
ok 8 conflict-not-disjoint
[drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000002, set: 00000002, masked: no): ret=-22
[drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000001, set: 00000001, masked: yes): ret=-22
ok 9 conflict-reg-type
# xe_rtp_process_tests: pass:9 fail:0 skip:0 total:9
ok 1 xe_rtp_process_tests
# Totals: pass:9 fail:0 skip:0 total:9
ok 1 xe_rtp
...
Note that the ERRORs in the kernel log are expected since it's testing
incompatible entries.
v2:
- Use parameterized table for tests (Michał Winiarski)
- Move everything to the xe_rtp_test.ko and only add a few exports to the
right namespace
- Add more tests to cover FIELD_SET, CLR, partially true rules, etc
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> # v1
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230401085151.1786204-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
