| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Instead of centralizing all headers in the same folder. Separate them into
different folders and place them among those source files those who really
need them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Create new structure SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE_SINGLE, as initialState.levels
and ACPIState.levels are never actually used as flexible arrays. Those
arrays can be used as simple objects of type
SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL, instead.
Currently, the code fails because flexible array _levels_ in
struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE doesn't allow for code that accesses
the first element of initialState.levels and ACPIState.levels
arrays:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:
4820: table->initialState.levels[0].mclk.vDLL_CNTL =
4821: cpu_to_be32(si_pi->clock_registers.dll_cntl);
...
5021: table->ACPIState.levels[0].mclk.vDLL_CNTL =
5022: cpu_to_be32(dll_cntl);
because such element cannot be accessed without previously allocating
enough dynamic memory for it to exist (which never actually happens).
So, there is an out-of-bounds bug in this case.
That's why struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE should only be used as type
for object driverState and new struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE_SINGLE is
created as type for objects initialState, ACPIState and ULVState.
Also, with the change from one-element array to flexible-array member
in commit 0e1aa13ca3ff ("drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with
flexible-array in struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE"), the size of
dpmLevels in struct SISLANDS_SMC_STATETABLE should be fixed to be
SISLANDS_MAX_SMC_PERFORMANCE_LEVELS_PER_SWSTATE instead of
SISLANDS_MAX_SMC_PERFORMANCE_LEVELS_PER_SWSTATE - 1.
Fixes: 0e1aa13ca3ff ("drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct SISLANDS_SMC_SWSTATE, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
fix the following warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:2448:20: warning: array
subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’
{aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:2449:20: warning: array
subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’
{aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:2450:20: warning: array
subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’
{aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:2451:20: warning: array
subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’
{aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:2452:20: warning: array
subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’
{aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/si_dpm.c:5570:20: warning: array
subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’
{aka ‘struct SISLANDS_SMC_HW_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6023be58.sk66L%2FV4vuSJI5mI%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
The target is to provide a clear entry point(for power routines).
Also this can help to maintain a clear view about the frameworks
used on different ASICs. Hopefully all these can make power part
more friendly to play with.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
