| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When the s390 SHA-256 code is built as a loadable module, name it
sha256-s390.ko instead of sha256.ko. This avoids a module name
collision with crypto/sha256.ko and makes it consistent with the other
architectures.
We should consider making a single module provide all the SHA-256
library code, which would prevent issues like this. But for now this is
the fix that's needed.
Fixes: b9eac03edcf8 ("crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash")
Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250529110526.6d2959a9.alex.williamson@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Instead of providing crypto_shash algorithms for the arch-optimized
SHA-256 code, instead implement the SHA-256 library. This is much
simpler, it makes the SHA-256 library functions be arch-optimized, and
it fixes the longstanding issue where the arch-optimized SHA-256 was
disabled by default. SHA-256 still remains available through
crypto_shash, but individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Continue disentangling the crypto library functions from the generic
crypto infrastructure by moving the s390 ChaCha library functions into a
new directory arch/s390/lib/crypto/ that does not depend on CRYPTO.
This mirrors the distinction between crypto/ and lib/crypto/.
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
