summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/incomplete-devices.yaml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-09-05dt-bindings: incomplete-devices: And another batch of compatiblesRob Herring (Arm)1-0/+148
Another batch of compatibles unlikely to ever be documented. It's mostly old PowerMAC and PPC stuff found in DT compatible API calls. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904200253.3112699-1-robh@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
2024-07-12dt-bindings: incomplete-devices: document devices without bindingsKrzysztof Kozlowski1-0/+137
There are devices in the wild with non-updatable firmware coming with ACPI tables with rejected compatibles, e.g. "ltr,ltrf216a". Linux kernel still supports this device via ACPI PRP0001, however the compatible was never accepted to bindings. There are also several early PowerPC or SPARC platforms using compatibles for their OpenFirmware, but without in-tree DTS. Often the legacy compatible is not correct in terms of current Devicetree specification, e.g. missing vendor prefix. Finally there are also Linux-specific tools and test code with compatibles. Add a schema covering above cases purely to satisfy the DT schema and scripts/checkpatch.pl checks for undocumented compatibles. For ltr,ltrf216a this also documents the consensus: compatible is allowed only via ACPI PRP0001, but not bindings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240705095047.90558-1-marex@denx.de/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220731173446.7400bfa8@jic23-huawei/T/#me55be502302d70424a85368c2645c89f860b7b40 Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240712121146.90942-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>