diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-09-13 20:43:04 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-09-13 20:43:04 +0300 |
commit | 316346243be6df12799c0b64b788e06bad97c30b (patch) | |
tree | 63055a6fb9287813a6ca44fc81fd5541a4353880 /tools/include/linux/overflow.h | |
parent | a69ae291e1cc2d08ae77c2029579c59c9bde5061 (diff) | |
parent | df26327ea097eb78e7967c45df6b23010c43c28d (diff) | |
download | linux-316346243be6df12799c0b64b788e06bad97c30b.tar.xz |
Merge branch 'gcc-min-version-5.1' (make gcc-5.1 the minimum version)
Merge patch series from Nick Desaulniers to update the minimum gcc
version to 5.1.
This is some of the left-overs from the merge window that I didn't want
to deal with yesterday, so it comes in after -rc1 but was sent before.
Gcc-4.9 support has been an annoyance for some time, and with -Werror I
had the choice of applying a fairly big patch from Kees Cook to remove a
fair number of initializer warnings (still leaving some), or this patch
series from Nick that just removes the source of the problem.
The initializer cleanups might still be worth it regardless, but
honestly, I preferred just tackling the problem with gcc-4.9 head-on.
We've been more aggressiuve about no longer having to care about
compilers that were released a long time ago, and I think it's been a
good thing.
I added a couple of patches on top to sort out a few left-overs now that
we no longer support gcc-4.x.
As noted by Arnd, as a result of this minimum compiler version upgrade
we can probably change our use of '--std=gnu89' to '--std=gnu11', and
finally start using local loop declarations etc. But this series does
_not_ yet do that.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210909182525.372ee687@canb.auug.org.au/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK7LNASs6dvU6D3jL2GG3jW58fXfaj6VNOe55NJnTB8UPuk2pA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438
* emailed patches from Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>:
Drop some straggling mentions of gcc-4.9 as being stale
compiler_attributes.h: drop __has_attribute() support for gcc4
vmlinux.lds.h: remove old check for GCC 4.9
compiler-gcc.h: drop checks for older GCC versions
Makefile: drop GCC < 5 -fno-var-tracking-assignments workaround
arm64: remove GCC version check for ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
powerpc: remove GCC version check for UPD_CONSTR
riscv: remove Kconfig check for GCC version for ARCH_RV64I
Kconfig.debug: drop GCC 5+ version check for DWARF5
mm/ksm: remove old GCC 4.9+ check
compiler.h: drop fallback overflow checkers
Documentation: raise minimum supported version of GCC to 5.1
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/include/linux/overflow.h')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/include/linux/overflow.h | 140 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 137 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/overflow.h b/tools/include/linux/overflow.h index 8712ff70995f..dcb0c1bf6866 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/overflow.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/overflow.h @@ -5,12 +5,9 @@ #include <linux/compiler.h> /* - * In the fallback code below, we need to compute the minimum and - * maximum values representable in a given type. These macros may also - * be useful elsewhere, so we provide them outside the - * COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW block. - * - * It would seem more obvious to do something like + * We need to compute the minimum and maximum values representable in a given + * type. These macros may also be useful elsewhere. It would seem more obvious + * to do something like: * * #define type_min(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? (T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1) : 0) * #define type_max(T) (T)(is_signed_type(T) ? ((T)1 << (8*sizeof(T)-1)) - 1 : ~(T)0) @@ -36,8 +33,6 @@ #define type_max(T) ((T)((__type_half_max(T) - 1) + __type_half_max(T))) #define type_min(T) ((T)((T)-type_max(T)-(T)1)) - -#ifdef COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW /* * For simplicity and code hygiene, the fallback code below insists on * a, b and *d having the same type (similar to the min() and max() @@ -73,135 +68,6 @@ __builtin_mul_overflow(__a, __b, __d); \ }) -#else - - -/* Checking for unsigned overflow is relatively easy without causing UB. */ -#define __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a + __b; \ - *__d < __a; \ -}) -#define __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a - __b; \ - __a < __b; \ -}) -/* - * If one of a or b is a compile-time constant, this avoids a division. - */ -#define __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = __a * __b; \ - __builtin_constant_p(__b) ? \ - __b > 0 && __a > type_max(typeof(__a)) / __b : \ - __a > 0 && __b > type_max(typeof(__b)) / __a; \ -}) - -/* - * For signed types, detecting overflow is much harder, especially if - * we want to avoid UB. But the interface of these macros is such that - * we must provide a result in *d, and in fact we must produce the - * result promised by gcc's builtins, which is simply the possibly - * wrapped-around value. Fortunately, we can just formally do the - * operations in the widest relevant unsigned type (u64) and then - * truncate the result - gcc is smart enough to generate the same code - * with and without the (u64) casts. - */ - -/* - * Adding two signed integers can overflow only if they have the same - * sign, and overflow has happened iff the result has the opposite - * sign. - */ -#define __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a + (u64)__b; \ - (((~(__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a)) \ - & type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0; \ -}) - -/* - * Subtraction is similar, except that overflow can now happen only - * when the signs are opposite. In this case, overflow has happened if - * the result has the opposite sign of a. - */ -#define __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a - (u64)__b; \ - ((((__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a)) \ - & type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0; \ -}) - -/* - * Signed multiplication is rather hard. gcc always follows C99, so - * division is truncated towards 0. This means that we can write the - * overflow check like this: - * - * (a > 0 && (b > MAX/a || b < MIN/a)) || - * (a < -1 && (b > MIN/a || b < MAX/a) || - * (a == -1 && b == MIN) - * - * The redundant casts of -1 are to silence an annoying -Wtype-limits - * (included in -Wextra) warning: When the type is u8 or u16, the - * __b_c_e in check_mul_overflow obviously selects - * __unsigned_mul_overflow, but unfortunately gcc still parses this - * code and warns about the limited range of __b. - */ - -#define __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({ \ - typeof(a) __a = (a); \ - typeof(b) __b = (b); \ - typeof(d) __d = (d); \ - typeof(a) __tmax = type_max(typeof(a)); \ - typeof(a) __tmin = type_min(typeof(a)); \ - (void) (&__a == &__b); \ - (void) (&__a == __d); \ - *__d = (u64)__a * (u64)__b; \ - (__b > 0 && (__a > __tmax/__b || __a < __tmin/__b)) || \ - (__b < (typeof(__b))-1 && (__a > __tmin/__b || __a < __tmax/__b)) || \ - (__b == (typeof(__b))-1 && __a == __tmin); \ -}) - - -#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d)) - -#define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d) \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d)) - -#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) \ - __builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)), \ - __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d), \ - __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d)) - - -#endif /* COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW */ - /** * array_size() - Calculate size of 2-dimensional array. * |