diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-09-02 22:35:34 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-09-02 22:35:34 +0300 |
commit | b55060d796c5300ad7a410cb5faec36582925570 (patch) | |
tree | 7711068e1cfdb3cb87541d42678272314bf9e4e1 /security | |
parent | c815f04ba94940fbc303a6ea9669e7da87f8e77d (diff) | |
parent | a8fc576d4af2f23a87a586424252df97f0ad0b06 (diff) | |
download | linux-b55060d796c5300ad7a410cb5faec36582925570.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'hardening-v5.15-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
Pull hardening updates from Kees Cook:
- Expand lib/test_stackinit to include more initialization styles
- Improve Kconfig for CLang's auto-var-init feature
- Introduce support for GCC's zero-call-used-regs feature
* tag 'hardening-v5.15-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
lib/test_stackinit: Add assigned initializers
lib/test_stackinit: Allow building stand-alone
lib/test_stackinit: Fix static initializer test
hardening: Clarify Kconfig text for auto-var-init
hardening: Introduce CONFIG_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r-- | security/Kconfig.hardening | 71 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/security/Kconfig.hardening b/security/Kconfig.hardening index a56c36470cb1..90cbaff86e13 100644 --- a/security/Kconfig.hardening +++ b/security/Kconfig.hardening @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ choice prompt "Initialize kernel stack variables at function entry" default GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL if COMPILE_TEST && GCC_PLUGINS default INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN if COMPILE_TEST && CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN + default INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN default INIT_STACK_NONE help This option enables initialization of stack variables at @@ -39,11 +40,11 @@ choice syscalls. This chooses the level of coverage over classes of potentially - uninitialized variables. The selected class will be + uninitialized variables. The selected class of variable will be initialized before use in a function. config INIT_STACK_NONE - bool "no automatic initialization (weakest)" + bool "no automatic stack variable initialization (weakest)" help Disable automatic stack variable initialization. This leaves the kernel vulnerable to the standard @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ choice and is disallowed. config GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL - bool "zero-init anything passed by reference (very strong)" + bool "zero-init everything passed by reference (very strong)" depends on GCC_PLUGINS depends on !(KASAN && KASAN_STACK) select GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK @@ -91,33 +92,44 @@ choice of uninitialized stack variable exploits and information exposures. + As a side-effect, this keeps a lot of variables on the + stack that can otherwise be optimized out, so combining + this with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK can lead to a stack overflow + and is disallowed. + config INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN - bool "0xAA-init everything on the stack (strongest)" + bool "pattern-init everything (strongest)" depends on CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN help - Initializes everything on the stack with a 0xAA - pattern. This is intended to eliminate all classes - of uninitialized stack variable exploits and information - exposures, even variables that were warned to have been - left uninitialized. + Initializes everything on the stack (including padding) + with a specific debug value. This is intended to eliminate + all classes of uninitialized stack variable exploits and + information exposures, even variables that were warned about + having been left uninitialized. Pattern initialization is known to provoke many existing bugs related to uninitialized locals, e.g. pointers receive - non-NULL values, buffer sizes and indices are very big. + non-NULL values, buffer sizes and indices are very big. The + pattern is situation-specific; Clang on 64-bit uses 0xAA + repeating for all types and padding except float and double + which use 0xFF repeating (-NaN). Clang on 32-bit uses 0xFF + repeating for all types and padding. config INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO - bool "zero-init everything on the stack (strongest and safest)" + bool "zero-init everything (strongest and safest)" depends on CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO help - Initializes everything on the stack with a zero - value. This is intended to eliminate all classes - of uninitialized stack variable exploits and information - exposures, even variables that were warned to have been - left uninitialized. - - Zero initialization provides safe defaults for strings, - pointers, indices and sizes, and is therefore - more suitable as a security mitigation measure. + Initializes everything on the stack (including padding) + with a zero value. This is intended to eliminate all + classes of uninitialized stack variable exploits and + information exposures, even variables that were warned + about having been left uninitialized. + + Zero initialization provides safe defaults for strings + (immediately NUL-terminated), pointers (NULL), indices + (index 0), and sizes (0 length), so it is therefore more + suitable as a production security mitigation than pattern + initialization. endchoice @@ -217,6 +229,25 @@ config INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON touching "cold" memory areas. Most cases see 3-5% impact. Some synthetic workloads have measured as high as 8%. +config CC_HAS_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS + def_bool $(cc-option,-fzero-call-used-regs=used-gpr) + +config ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS + bool "Enable register zeroing on function exit" + depends on CC_HAS_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS + help + At the end of functions, always zero any caller-used register + contents. This helps ensure that temporary values are not + leaked beyond the function boundary. This means that register + contents are less likely to be available for side channels + and information exposures. Additionally, this helps reduce the + number of useful ROP gadgets by about 20% (and removes compiler + generated "write-what-where" gadgets) in the resulting kernel + image. This has a less than 1% performance impact on most + workloads. Image size growth depends on architecture, and should + be evaluated for suitability. For example, x86_64 grows by less + than 1%, and arm64 grows by about 5%. + endmenu endmenu |