diff options
author | Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> | 2021-09-22 12:36:45 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2021-10-26 20:08:02 +0300 |
commit | 49d0c6424cf13a30768eace116769fe98f8fb69f (patch) | |
tree | 1194d00dae1107ed08cfe89fc657bafcf903d00c /scripts/generate_rust_analyzer.py | |
parent | 8ef9dc0f14ba6124c62547a4fdc59b163d8b864e (diff) | |
download | linux-49d0c6424cf13a30768eace116769fe98f8fb69f.tar.xz |
btrfs: assert that extent buffers are write locked instead of only locked
We currently use lockdep_assert_held() at btrfs_assert_tree_locked(), and
that checks that we hold a lock either in read mode or write mode.
However in all contexts we use btrfs_assert_tree_locked(), we actually
want to check if we are holding a write lock on the extent buffer's rw
semaphore - it would be a bug if in any of those contexts we were holding
a read lock instead.
So change btrfs_assert_tree_locked() to use lockdep_assert_held_write()
instead and, to make it more explicit, rename btrfs_assert_tree_locked()
to btrfs_assert_tree_write_locked(), so that it's clear we want to check
we are holding a write lock.
For now there are no contexts where we want to assert that we must have
a read lock, but in case that is needed in the future, we can add a new
helper function that just calls out lockdep_assert_held_read().
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/generate_rust_analyzer.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions