summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rust
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDanilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>2024-05-01 16:47:43 +0300
committerMiguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>2024-05-08 01:43:30 +0300
commit97ab3e8eec0ce79d9e265e6c9e4c480492180409 (patch)
tree2df4dafe7d875b38f3ccf7f5a7cf08f068ea4b37 /rust
parent56f64b370612d8967df2c2e0cead805444d4e71a (diff)
downloadlinux-97ab3e8eec0ce79d9e265e6c9e4c480492180409.tar.xz
rust: alloc: fix dangling pointer in VecExt<T>::reserve()
Currently, a Vec<T>'s ptr value, after calling Vec<T>::new(), is initialized to Unique::dangling(). Hence, in VecExt<T>::reserve(), we're passing a dangling pointer (instead of NULL) to krealloc() whenever a new Vec<T>'s backing storage is allocated through VecExt<T> extension functions. This only works as long as align_of::<T>(), used by Unique::dangling() to derive the dangling pointer, resolves to a value between 0x0 and ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10) and krealloc() hence treats it the same as a NULL pointer however. This isn't a case we should rely on, since there may be types whose alignment may exceed the range still covered by krealloc(), plus other kernel allocators are not as tolerant either. Instead, pass a real NULL pointer to krealloc_aligned() if Vec<T>'s capacity is zero. Fixes: 5ab560ce12ed ("rust: alloc: update `VecExt` to take allocation flags") Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240501134834.22323-1-dakr@redhat.com [ Solved `use` conflict and applied the `if`-instead-of-`match` change discussed in the list. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust')
-rw-r--r--rust/kernel/alloc/vec_ext.rs11
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/vec_ext.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/vec_ext.rs
index 25025a36e250..e9a81052728a 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/alloc/vec_ext.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/vec_ext.rs
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
use super::{AllocError, Flags};
use alloc::vec::Vec;
+use core::ptr;
/// Extensions to [`Vec`].
pub trait VecExt<T>: Sized {
@@ -134,14 +135,20 @@ impl<T> VecExt<T> for Vec<T> {
let new_cap = core::cmp::max(cap * 2, len.checked_add(additional).ok_or(AllocError)?);
let layout = core::alloc::Layout::array::<T>(new_cap).map_err(|_| AllocError)?;
- let (ptr, len, cap) = destructure(self);
+ let (old_ptr, len, cap) = destructure(self);
+
+ // We need to make sure that `ptr` is either NULL or comes from a previous call to
+ // `krealloc_aligned`. A `Vec<T>`'s `ptr` value is not guaranteed to be NULL and might be
+ // dangling after being created with `Vec::new`. Instead, we can rely on `Vec<T>`'s capacity
+ // to be zero if no memory has been allocated yet.
+ let ptr = if cap == 0 { ptr::null_mut() } else { old_ptr };
// SAFETY: `ptr` is valid because it's either NULL or comes from a previous call to
// `krealloc_aligned`. We also verified that the type is not a ZST.
let new_ptr = unsafe { super::allocator::krealloc_aligned(ptr.cast(), layout, flags) };
if new_ptr.is_null() {
// SAFETY: We are just rebuilding the existing `Vec` with no changes.
- unsafe { rebuild(self, ptr, len, cap) };
+ unsafe { rebuild(self, old_ptr, len, cap) };
Err(AllocError)
} else {
// SAFETY: `ptr` has been reallocated with the layout for `new_cap` elements. New cap