diff options
author | Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> | 2024-09-25 11:54:40 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2024-10-02 12:27:54 +0300 |
commit | d4ac164bde7a12ec0a238a7ead5aa26819bbb1c1 (patch) | |
tree | 7ac2beb302f0260f6d4437d86af83b63b290fd0f /rust/helpers/helpers.c | |
parent | 9b5ce1a37e904fac32d560668134965f4e937f6c (diff) | |
download | linux-d4ac164bde7a12ec0a238a7ead5aa26819bbb1c1.tar.xz |
sched/eevdf: Fix wakeup-preempt by checking cfs_rq->nr_running
Commit 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
introduced a mechanism that a wakee with shorter slice could preempt
the current running task. It also lower the bar for the current task
to be preempted, by checking the rq->nr_running instead of cfs_rq->nr_running
when the current task has ran out of time slice. But there is a scenario
that is problematic. Say, if there is 1 cfs task and 1 rt task, before
85e511df3cec, update_deadline() will not trigger a reschedule, and after
85e511df3cec, since rq->nr_running is 2 and resched is true, a resched_curr()
would happen.
Some workloads (like the hackbench reported by lkp) do not like
over-scheduling. We can see that the preemption rate has been
increased by 2.2%:
1.654e+08 +2.2% 1.69e+08 hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
Restore its previous check criterion.
Fixes: 85e511df3cec ("sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preempt")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231416.9403c2e9-oliver.sang@intel.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Honglei Wang <jameshongleiwang@126.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240925085440.358138-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/helpers/helpers.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions