summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv6
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>2016-04-01 15:17:21 +0300
committerPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>2016-04-14 01:30:34 +0300
commitf24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e (patch)
tree941d889997d998419e5d3a6e5486188dfe5457a7 /net/ipv6
parent7d45a04cbc2683f9552572850f1c711d9b96dd26 (diff)
downloadlinux-f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e.tar.xz
netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule
Ben Hawkes says: In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it is possible for a user-supplied ipt_entry structure to have a large next_offset field. This field is not bounds checked prior to writing a counter value at the supplied offset. Base chains enforce absolute verdict. User defined chains are supposed to end with an unconditional return, xtables userspace adds them automatically. But if such return is missing we will move to non-existent next rule. Reported-by: Ben Hawkes <hawkes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv6')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
index 86b67b70b626..7b3335bce3fd 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table_info *newinfo,
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct ip6t_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -553,6 +555,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table_info *newinfo,
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct ip6t_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);