diff options
author | Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> | 2024-04-22 06:00:39 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-05-06 03:53:43 +0300 |
commit | 6ed31ba3921162ef5d4f2f99b91681e8fd24ff34 (patch) | |
tree | d5965ed7c08ec0e2d280dd65a412673328f04f37 /mm | |
parent | 2d8b272cdcad17d9b875c206fbcb0422b791ab3a (diff) | |
download | linux-6ed31ba3921162ef5d4f2f99b91681e8fd24ff34.tar.xz |
mm: memory: check userfaultfd_wp() in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp()
Add userfaultfd_wp() check in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() to avoid the
unnecessary FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID check/pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp() in
most pagefault, note, the function vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() is not inlined
in the two kernel versions, the difference is shown below,
perf date,
perf report -i perf.data.before | grep vmf
0.17% 0.13% lat_pagefault [kernel.kallsyms] [k] vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.part.0.isra.0
perf report -i perf.data.after | grep vmf
lat_pagefault -W 5 -N 5 /tmp/XXX
latency before after diff
average(8 tests) 0.262675 0.2600375 -0.0026375
Although it's a small, but the uffd_wp is a new feature than previous
kernel, when the vma is not registered with UFFD_WP, let's avoid to
execute the new logical, also adding __always_inline attribute to
vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(), which make set_pte_range() only check VM_UFFD_WP
flags without the function call. In addition, directly call the
vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() in do_anonymous_page() and set_pte_range() to save
an uffd_wp variable.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240422030039.3293568-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memory.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 9e07d1b9020c..c0bd4e0d5e7a 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -112,8 +112,10 @@ static bool vmf_pte_changed(struct vm_fault *vmf); * Return true if the original pte was a uffd-wp pte marker (so the pte was * wr-protected). */ -static bool vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf) +static __always_inline bool vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf) { + if (!userfaultfd_wp(vmf->vma)) + return false; if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID)) return false; @@ -4393,7 +4395,6 @@ fallback: */ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) { - bool uffd_wp = vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf); struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; unsigned long addr = vmf->address; struct folio *folio; @@ -4493,7 +4494,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, addr); folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma); setpte: - if (uffd_wp) + if (vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf)) entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry); set_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, vmf->pte, entry, nr_pages); @@ -4668,7 +4669,6 @@ void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio, struct page *page, unsigned int nr, unsigned long addr) { struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; - bool uffd_wp = vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf); bool write = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; bool prefault = in_range(vmf->address, addr, nr * PAGE_SIZE); pte_t entry; @@ -4683,7 +4683,7 @@ void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio, if (write) entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma); - if (unlikely(uffd_wp)) + if (unlikely(vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf))) entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry); /* copy-on-write page */ if (write && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) { |