diff options
author | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2018-06-22 13:45:07 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2018-06-22 20:04:22 +0300 |
commit | 784e0300fe9fe4aa81bd7df9d59e138f56bb605b (patch) | |
tree | 442642dae3c8e1b50ab68460c2e7662684d9e194 /kernel/rseq.c | |
parent | 9a789fcfe8605417f7a1a970355f5efa4fe88c64 (diff) | |
download | linux-784e0300fe9fe4aa81bd7df9d59e138f56bb605b.tar.xz |
rseq: Avoid infinite recursion when delivering SIGSEGV
When delivering a signal to a task that is using rseq, we call into
__rseq_handle_notify_resume() so that the registers pushed in the
sigframe are updated to reflect the state of the restartable sequence
(for example, ensuring that the signal returns to the abort handler if
necessary).
However, if the rseq management fails due to an unrecoverable fault when
accessing userspace or certain combinations of RSEQ_CS_* flags, then we
will attempt to deliver a SIGSEGV. This has the potential for infinite
recursion if the rseq code continuously fails on signal delivery.
Avoid this problem by using force_sigsegv() instead of force_sig(), which
is explicitly designed to reset the SEGV handler to SIG_DFL in the case
of a recursive fault. In doing so, remove rseq_signal_deliver() from the
internal rseq API and have an optional struct ksignal * parameter to
rseq_handle_notify_resume() instead.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529664307-983-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rseq.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rseq.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rseq.c b/kernel/rseq.c index ae306f90c514..22b6acf1ad63 100644 --- a/kernel/rseq.c +++ b/kernel/rseq.c @@ -251,10 +251,10 @@ static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs *regs) * respect to other threads scheduled on the same CPU, and with respect * to signal handlers. */ -void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs) +void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct task_struct *t = current; - int ret; + int ret, sig; if (unlikely(t->flags & PF_EXITING)) return; @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs) return; error: - force_sig(SIGSEGV, t); + sig = ksig ? ksig->sig : 0; + force_sigsegv(sig, t); } #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ |