summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ipc/syscall.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-03-20 02:05:25 +0300
committerKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>2020-03-23 20:18:27 +0300
commit0562ebcf054afae5100782ba082355be0495b04d (patch)
treee1eb547b5bd6a61c12f6e073f3643ab350ae3a51 /ipc/syscall.c
parentb0c40588161dafdafdbac537b4441be02c15aff2 (diff)
downloadlinux-0562ebcf054afae5100782ba082355be0495b04d.tar.xz
ray_cs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230525.GA14835@embeddedor.com
Diffstat (limited to 'ipc/syscall.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions