diff options
author | Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> | 2024-09-03 11:21:44 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2024-09-03 12:49:27 +0300 |
commit | 2c9ffe872e64f5aec12f2ff6cec1b7542569a88f (patch) | |
tree | 9ce1afad853e7bfa791b651d1a93d35f04467770 /include/net | |
parent | 20361712880396e44ce80aaeec2d93d182035651 (diff) | |
download | linux-2c9ffe872e64f5aec12f2ff6cec1b7542569a88f.tar.xz |
wifi: cfg80211: wext: Update spelling and grammar
Correct spelling in iw_handler.h.
As reported by codespell.
Also, while the "few shortcomings" line is being updated,
correct its grammar.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240903-wifi-spell-v2-1-bfcf7062face@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/net')
-rw-r--r-- | include/net/iw_handler.h | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/include/net/iw_handler.h b/include/net/iw_handler.h index b2cf243ebe44..7af1082ea9a0 100644 --- a/include/net/iw_handler.h +++ b/include/net/iw_handler.h @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ * to handle wireless statistics. * * The initial APIs served us well and has proven a reasonably good design. - * However, there is a few shortcommings : + * However, there are a few shortcomings : * o No events, everything is a request to the driver. * o Large ioctl function in driver with gigantic switch statement * (i.e. spaghetti code). @@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ * ------------------------------- * The new driver API is just a bunch of standard functions (handlers), * each handling a specific Wireless Extension. The driver just export - * the list of handler it supports, and those will be called apropriately. + * the list of handler it supports, and those will be called appropriately. * * I tried to keep the main advantage of the previous API (simplicity, * efficiency and light weight), and also I provide a good dose of backward * compatibility (most structures are the same, driver can use both API * simultaneously, ...). - * Hopefully, I've also addressed the shortcomming of the initial API. + * Hopefully, I've also addressed the shortcoming of the initial API. * * The advantage of the new API are : * o Handling of Extensions in driver broken in small contained functions @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ /* ---------------------- THE IMPLEMENTATION ---------------------- */ /* - * Some of the choice I've made are pretty controversials. Defining an + * Some of the choice I've made are pretty controversial. Defining an * API is very much weighting compromises. This goes into some of the * details and the thinking behind the implementation. * @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ * example to distinguish setting max rate and basic rate), I would * break the prototype. Using iwreq_data is more flexible. * 3) Also, the above form is not generic (see above). - * 4) I don't expect driver developper using the wrong field of the + * 4) I don't expect driver developer using the wrong field of the * union (Doh !), so static typechecking doesn't add much value. * 5) Lastly, you can skip the union by doing : * static int mydriver_ioctl_setrate(struct net_device *dev, @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ int iw_handler_get_thrspy(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info, void wireless_spy_update(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *address, struct iw_quality *wstats); -/************************* INLINE FUNTIONS *************************/ +/************************* INLINE FUNCTIONS *************************/ /* * Function that are so simple that it's more efficient inlining them */ |