mm, slub: change percpu partial accounting from objects to pages

With CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL enabled, SLUB keeps a percpu list of
partial slabs that can be promoted to cpu slab when the previous one is
depleted, without accessing the shared partial list.  A slab can be
added to this list by 1) refill of an empty list from get_partial_node()
- once we really have to access the shared partial list, we acquire
multiple slabs to amortize the cost of locking, and 2) first free to a
previously full slab - instead of putting the slab on a shared partial
list, we can more cheaply freeze it and put it on the per-cpu list.

To control how large a percpu partial list can grow for a kmem cache,
set_cpu_partial() calculates a target number of free objects on each
cpu's percpu partial list, and this can be also set by the sysfs file
cpu_partial.

However, the tracking of actual number of objects is imprecise, in order
to limit overhead from cpu X freeing an objects to a slab on percpu
partial list of cpu Y.  Basically, the percpu partial slabs form a
single linked list, and when we add a new slab to the list with current
head "oldpage", we set in the struct page of the slab we're adding:

    page->pages = oldpage->pages + 1; // this is precise
    page->pobjects = oldpage->pobjects + (page->objects - page->inuse);
    page->next = oldpage;

Thus the real number of free objects in the slab (objects - inuse) is
only determined at the moment of adding the slab to the percpu partial
list, and further freeing doesn't update the pobjects counter nor
propagate it to the current list head.  As Jann reports [1], this can
easily lead to large inaccuracies, where the target number of objects
(up to 30 by default) can translate to the same number of (empty) slab
pages on the list.  In case 2) above, we put a slab with 1 free object
on the list, thus only increase page->pobjects by 1, even if there are
subsequent frees on the same slab.  Jann has noticed this in practice
and so did we [2] when investigating significant increase of kmemcg
usage after switching from SLAB to SLUB.

While this is no longer a problem in kmemcg context thanks to the
accounting rewrite in 5.9, the memory waste is still not ideal and it's
questionable whether it makes sense to perform free object count based
control when object counts can easily become so much inaccurate.  So
this patch converts the accounting to be based on number of pages only
(which is precise) and removes the page->pobjects field completely.
This is also ultimately simpler.

To retain the existing set_cpu_partial() heuristic, first calculate the
target number of objects as previously, but then convert it to target
number of pages by assuming the pages will be half-filled on average.
This assumption might obviously also be inaccurate in practice, but
cannot degrade to actual number of pages being equal to the target
number of objects.

We could also skip the intermediate step with target number of objects
and rewrite the heuristic in terms of pages.  However we still have the
sysfs file cpu_partial which uses number of objects and could break
existing users if it suddenly becomes number of pages, so this patch
doesn't do that.

In practice, after this patch the heuristics limit the size of percpu
partial list up to 2 pages.  In case of a reported regression (which
would mean some workload has benefited from the previous imprecise
object based counting), we can tune the heuristics to get a better
compromise within the new scheme, while still avoid the unexpectedly
long percpu partial lists.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAG48ez2Qx5K1Cab-m8BdSibp6wLTip6ro4=-umR7BLsEgjEYzA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/2f0f46e8-2535-410a-1859-e9cfa4e57c18@suse.cz/

==========
Evaluation
==========

Mel was kind enough to run v1 through mmtests machinery for netperf
(localhost) and hackbench and, for most significant results see below.
So there are some apparent regressions, especially with hackbench, which
I think ultimately boils down to having shorter percpu partial lists on
average and some benchmarks benefiting from longer ones.  Monitoring
slab usage also indicated less memory usage by slab.  Based on that, the
following patch will bump the defaults to allow longer percpu partial
lists than after this patch.

However the goal is certainly not such that we would limit the percpu
partial lists to 30 pages just because previously a specific alloc/free
pattern could lead to the limit of 30 objects translate to a limit to 30
pages - that would make little sense.  This is a correctness patch, and
if a workload benefits from larger lists, the sysfs tuning knobs are
still there to allow that.

Netperf

  2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5218R CPU @ 2.10GHz (20 cores, 40 threads per socket), 384GB RAM
  TCP-RR:
    hmean before 127045.79 after 121092.94 (-4.69%, worse)
    stddev before  2634.37 after   1254.08
  UDP-RR:
    hmean before 166985.45 after 160668.94 ( -3.78%, worse)
    stddev before 4059.69 after 1943.63

  2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz (20 cores, 40 threads per socket), 512GB RAM
  TCP-RR:
    hmean before 84173.25 after 76914.72 ( -8.62%, worse)
  UDP-RR:
    hmean before 93571.12 after 96428.69 ( 3.05%, better)
    stddev before 23118.54 after 16828.14

  2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz (12 cores, 24 threads per socket), 64GB RAM
  TCP-RR:
    hmean before 49984.92 after 48922.27 ( -2.13%, worse)
    stddev before 6248.15 after 4740.51
  UDP-RR:
    hmean before 61854.31 after 68761.81 ( 11.17%, better)
    stddev before 4093.54 after 5898.91

  other machines - within 2%

Hackbench

  (results before and after the patch, negative % means worse)

  2-socket AMD EPYC 7713 (64 cores, 128 threads per core), 256GB RAM
  hackbench-process-sockets
  Amean 	1 	0.5380	0.5583	( -3.78%)
  Amean 	4 	0.7510	0.8150	( -8.52%)
  Amean 	7 	0.7930	0.9533	( -20.22%)
  Amean 	12 	0.7853	1.1313	( -44.06%)
  Amean 	21 	1.1520	1.4993	( -30.15%)
  Amean 	30 	1.6223	1.9237	( -18.57%)
  Amean 	48 	2.6767	2.9903	( -11.72%)
  Amean 	79 	4.0257	5.1150	( -27.06%)
  Amean 	110	5.5193	7.4720	( -35.38%)
  Amean 	141	7.2207	9.9840	( -38.27%)
  Amean 	172	8.4770	12.1963	( -43.88%)
  Amean 	203	9.6473	14.3137	( -48.37%)
  Amean 	234	11.3960	18.7917	( -64.90%)
  Amean 	265	13.9627	22.4607	( -60.86%)
  Amean 	296	14.9163	26.0483	( -74.63%)

  hackbench-thread-sockets
  Amean 	1 	0.5597	0.5877	( -5.00%)
  Amean 	4 	0.7913	0.8960	( -13.23%)
  Amean 	7 	0.8190	1.0017	( -22.30%)
  Amean 	12 	0.9560	1.1727	( -22.66%)
  Amean 	21 	1.7587	1.5660	( 10.96%)
  Amean 	30 	2.4477	1.9807	( 19.08%)
  Amean 	48 	3.4573	3.0630	( 11.41%)
  Amean 	79 	4.7903	5.1733	( -8.00%)
  Amean 	110	6.1370	7.4220	( -20.94%)
  Amean 	141	7.5777	9.2617	( -22.22%)
  Amean 	172	9.2280	11.0907	( -20.18%)
  Amean 	203	10.2793	13.3470	( -29.84%)
  Amean 	234	11.2410	17.1070	( -52.18%)
  Amean 	265	12.5970	23.3323	( -85.22%)
  Amean 	296	17.1540	24.2857	( -41.57%)

  2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5218R CPU @ 2.10GHz (20 cores, 40 threads
  per socket), 384GB RAM
  hackbench-process-sockets
  Amean 	1 	0.5760	0.4793	( 16.78%)
  Amean 	4 	0.9430	0.9707	( -2.93%)
  Amean 	7 	1.5517	1.8843	( -21.44%)
  Amean 	12 	2.4903	2.7267	( -9.49%)
  Amean 	21 	3.9560	4.2877	( -8.38%)
  Amean 	30 	5.4613	5.8343	( -6.83%)
  Amean 	48 	8.5337	9.2937	( -8.91%)
  Amean 	79 	14.0670	15.2630	( -8.50%)
  Amean 	110	19.2253	21.2467	( -10.51%)
  Amean 	141	23.7557	25.8550	( -8.84%)
  Amean 	172	28.4407	29.7603	( -4.64%)
  Amean 	203	33.3407	33.9927	( -1.96%)
  Amean 	234	38.3633	39.1150	( -1.96%)
  Amean 	265	43.4420	43.8470	( -0.93%)
  Amean 	296	48.3680	48.9300	( -1.16%)

  hackbench-thread-sockets
  Amean 	1 	0.6080	0.6493	( -6.80%)
  Amean 	4 	1.0000	1.0513	( -5.13%)
  Amean 	7 	1.6607	2.0260	( -22.00%)
  Amean 	12 	2.7637	2.9273	( -5.92%)
  Amean 	21 	5.0613	4.5153	( 10.79%)
  Amean 	30 	6.3340	6.1140	( 3.47%)
  Amean 	48 	9.0567	9.5577	( -5.53%)
  Amean 	79 	14.5657	15.7983	( -8.46%)
  Amean 	110	19.6213	21.6333	( -10.25%)
  Amean 	141	24.1563	26.2697	( -8.75%)
  Amean 	172	28.9687	30.2187	( -4.32%)
  Amean 	203	33.9763	34.6970	( -2.12%)
  Amean 	234	38.8647	39.3207	( -1.17%)
  Amean 	265	44.0813	44.1507	( -0.16%)
  Amean 	296	49.2040	49.4330	( -0.47%)

  2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz (20 cores, 40 threads
  per socket), 512GB RAM
  hackbench-process-sockets
  Amean 	1 	0.5027	0.5017	( 0.20%)
  Amean 	4 	1.1053	1.2033	( -8.87%)
  Amean 	7 	1.8760	2.1820	( -16.31%)
  Amean 	12 	2.9053	3.1810	( -9.49%)
  Amean 	21 	4.6777	4.9920	( -6.72%)
  Amean 	30 	6.5180	6.7827	( -4.06%)
  Amean 	48 	10.0710	10.5227	( -4.48%)
  Amean 	79 	16.4250	17.5053	( -6.58%)
  Amean 	110	22.6203	24.4617	( -8.14%)
  Amean 	141	28.0967	31.0363	( -10.46%)
  Amean 	172	34.4030	36.9233	( -7.33%)
  Amean 	203	40.5933	43.0850	( -6.14%)
  Amean 	234	46.6477	48.7220	( -4.45%)
  Amean 	265	53.0530	53.9597	( -1.71%)
  Amean 	296	59.2760	59.9213	( -1.09%)

  hackbench-thread-sockets
  Amean 	1 	0.5363	0.5330	( 0.62%)
  Amean 	4 	1.1647	1.2157	( -4.38%)
  Amean 	7 	1.9237	2.2833	( -18.70%)
  Amean 	12 	2.9943	3.3110	( -10.58%)
  Amean 	21 	4.9987	5.1880	( -3.79%)
  Amean 	30 	6.7583	7.0043	( -3.64%)
  Amean 	48 	10.4547	10.8353	( -3.64%)
  Amean 	79 	16.6707	17.6790	( -6.05%)
  Amean 	110	22.8207	24.4403	( -7.10%)
  Amean 	141	28.7090	31.0533	( -8.17%)
  Amean 	172	34.9387	36.8260	( -5.40%)
  Amean 	203	41.1567	43.0450	( -4.59%)
  Amean 	234	47.3790	48.5307	( -2.43%)
  Amean 	265	53.9543	54.6987	( -1.38%)
  Amean 	296	60.0820	60.2163	( -0.22%)

  1-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v5 @ 3.50GHz (4 cores, 8 threads),
  32 GB RAM
  hackbench-process-sockets
  Amean 	1 	1.4760	1.5773	( -6.87%)
  Amean 	3 	3.9370	4.0910	( -3.91%)
  Amean 	5 	6.6797	6.9357	( -3.83%)
  Amean 	7 	9.3367	9.7150	( -4.05%)
  Amean 	12	15.7627	16.1400	( -2.39%)
  Amean 	18	23.5360	23.6890	( -0.65%)
  Amean 	24	31.0663	31.3137	( -0.80%)
  Amean 	30	38.7283	39.0037	( -0.71%)
  Amean 	32	41.3417	41.6097	( -0.65%)

  hackbench-thread-sockets
  Amean 	1 	1.5250	1.6043	( -5.20%)
  Amean 	3 	4.0897	4.2603	( -4.17%)
  Amean 	5 	6.7760	7.0933	( -4.68%)
  Amean 	7 	9.4817	9.9157	( -4.58%)
  Amean 	12	15.9610	16.3937	( -2.71%)
  Amean 	18	23.9543	24.3417	( -1.62%)
  Amean 	24	31.4400	31.7217	( -0.90%)
  Amean 	30	39.2457	39.5467	( -0.77%)
  Amean 	32	41.8267	42.1230	( -0.71%)

  2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz (12 cores, 24 threads
  per socket), 64GB RAM
  hackbench-process-sockets
  Amean 	1 	1.0347	1.0880	( -5.15%)
  Amean 	4 	1.7267	1.8527	( -7.30%)
  Amean 	7 	2.6707	2.8110	( -5.25%)
  Amean 	12 	4.1617	4.3383	( -4.25%)
  Amean 	21 	7.0070	7.2600	( -3.61%)
  Amean 	30 	9.9187	10.2397	( -3.24%)
  Amean 	48 	15.6710	16.3923	( -4.60%)
  Amean 	79 	24.7743	26.1247	( -5.45%)
  Amean 	110	34.3000	35.9307	( -4.75%)
  Amean 	141	44.2043	44.8010	( -1.35%)
  Amean 	172	54.2430	54.7260	( -0.89%)
  Amean 	192	60.6557	60.9777	( -0.53%)

  hackbench-thread-sockets
  Amean 	1 	1.0610	1.1353	( -7.01%)
  Amean 	4 	1.7543	1.9140	( -9.10%)
  Amean 	7 	2.7840	2.9573	( -6.23%)
  Amean 	12 	4.3813	4.4937	( -2.56%)
  Amean 	21 	7.3460	7.5350	( -2.57%)
  Amean 	30 	10.2313	10.5190	( -2.81%)
  Amean 	48 	15.9700	16.5940	( -3.91%)
  Amean 	79 	25.3973	26.6637	( -4.99%)
  Amean 	110	35.1087	36.4797	( -3.91%)
  Amean 	141	45.8220	46.3053	( -1.05%)
  Amean 	172	55.4917	55.7320	( -0.43%)
  Amean 	192	62.7490	62.5410	( 0.33%)

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211012134651.11258-1-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
index 85499f0586b0..0fa751b946fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
+++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ struct kmem_cache {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
 	/* Number of per cpu partial objects to keep around */
 	unsigned int cpu_partial;
+	/* Number of per cpu partial pages to keep around */
+	unsigned int cpu_partial_pages;
 #endif
 	struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo;
 
@@ -141,17 +143,6 @@ struct kmem_cache {
 	struct kmem_cache_node *node[MAX_NUMNODES];
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
-#define slub_cpu_partial(s)		((s)->cpu_partial)
-#define slub_set_cpu_partial(s, n)		\
-({						\
-	slub_cpu_partial(s) = (n);		\
-})
-#else
-#define slub_cpu_partial(s)		(0)
-#define slub_set_cpu_partial(s, n)
-#endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL */
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
 #define SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS
 void sysfs_slab_unlink(struct kmem_cache *);