Merge tag 'v3.12' into drm-intel-next

I want to merge in the new Broadwell support as a late hw enabling
pull request. But since the internal branch was based upon our
drm-intel-nightly integration branch I need to resolve all the
oustanding conflicts in drm/i915 with a backmerge to make the 60+
patches apply properly.

We'll propably have some fun because Linus will come up with a
slightly different merge solution.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

All rather simple adjacent lines changed or partial backports from
-next to -fixes, with the exception of the thaw code in i915_dma.c.
That one needed a bit of shuffling to restore the intent.

Oh and the massive header file reordering in intel_drv.h is a bit
trouble. But not much.

v2: Also don't forget the fixup for the silent conflict that results
in compile fail ...

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 58b7d14b08ee..08cc08f037a6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static void check_idle_worker(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker)
 		worker->idle = 1;
 
 		/* the list may be empty if the worker is just starting */
-		if (!list_empty(&worker->worker_list)) {
+		if (!list_empty(&worker->worker_list) &&
+		    !worker->workers->stopping) {
 			list_move(&worker->worker_list,
 				 &worker->workers->idle_list);
 		}
@@ -127,7 +128,8 @@ static void check_busy_worker(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker)
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->workers->lock, flags);
 		worker->idle = 0;
 
-		if (!list_empty(&worker->worker_list)) {
+		if (!list_empty(&worker->worker_list) &&
+		    !worker->workers->stopping) {
 			list_move_tail(&worker->worker_list,
 				      &worker->workers->worker_list);
 		}
@@ -412,6 +414,7 @@ void btrfs_stop_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers)
 	int can_stop;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock);
+	workers->stopping = 1;
 	list_splice_init(&workers->idle_list, &workers->worker_list);
 	while (!list_empty(&workers->worker_list)) {
 		cur = workers->worker_list.next;
@@ -455,6 +458,7 @@ void btrfs_init_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, char *name, int max,
 	workers->ordered = 0;
 	workers->atomic_start_pending = 0;
 	workers->atomic_worker_start = async_helper;
+	workers->stopping = 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -480,15 +484,19 @@ static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers)
 	atomic_set(&worker->num_pending, 0);
 	atomic_set(&worker->refs, 1);
 	worker->workers = workers;
-	worker->task = kthread_run(worker_loop, worker,
-				   "btrfs-%s-%d", workers->name,
-				   workers->num_workers + 1);
+	worker->task = kthread_create(worker_loop, worker,
+				      "btrfs-%s-%d", workers->name,
+				      workers->num_workers + 1);
 	if (IS_ERR(worker->task)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(worker->task);
-		kfree(worker);
 		goto fail;
 	}
+
 	spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock);
+	if (workers->stopping) {
+		spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock);
+		goto fail_kthread;
+	}
 	list_add_tail(&worker->worker_list, &workers->idle_list);
 	worker->idle = 1;
 	workers->num_workers++;
@@ -496,8 +504,13 @@ static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers)
 	WARN_ON(workers->num_workers_starting < 0);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock);
 
+	wake_up_process(worker->task);
 	return 0;
+
+fail_kthread:
+	kthread_stop(worker->task);
 fail:
+	kfree(worker);
 	spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock);
 	workers->num_workers_starting--;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock);