diff options
| author | Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@calian.com> | 2023-11-21 21:11:16 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> | 2024-09-11 23:21:07 +0300 |
| commit | 521da1e9225450bd323db5fa5bca942b1dc485b7 (patch) | |
| tree | a4dceed0baae25cceaea65eec19d1179145b937d /drivers/i2c | |
| parent | 93701d3b84ac5f3ea07259d4ced405c53d757985 (diff) | |
| download | linux-521da1e9225450bd323db5fa5bca942b1dc485b7.tar.xz | |
i2c: xiic: Wait for TX empty to avoid missed TX NAKs
Frequently an I2C write will be followed by a read, such as a register
address write followed by a read of the register value. In this driver,
when the TX FIFO half empty interrupt was raised and it was determined
that there was enough space in the TX FIFO to send the following read
command, it would do so without waiting for the TX FIFO to actually
empty.
Unfortunately it appears that in some cases this can result in a NAK
that was raised by the target device on the write, such as due to an
unsupported register address, being ignored and the subsequent read
being done anyway. This can potentially put the I2C bus into an
invalid state and/or result in invalid read data being processed.
To avoid this, once a message has been fully written to the TX FIFO,
wait for the TX FIFO empty interrupt before moving on to the next
message, to ensure NAKs are handled properly.
Fixes: e1d5b6598cdc ("i2c: Add support for Xilinx XPS IIC Bus Interface")
Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@calian.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.34+
Reviewed-by: Manikanta Guntupalli <manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/i2c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c index 19468565120e..bd6e107472b7 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c @@ -772,14 +772,17 @@ static irqreturn_t xiic_process(int irq, void *dev_id) goto out; } - xiic_fill_tx_fifo(i2c); - - /* current message sent and there is space in the fifo */ - if (!xiic_tx_space(i2c) && xiic_tx_fifo_space(i2c) >= 2) { + if (xiic_tx_space(i2c)) { + xiic_fill_tx_fifo(i2c); + } else { + /* current message fully written */ dev_dbg(i2c->adap.dev.parent, "%s end of message sent, nmsgs: %d\n", __func__, i2c->nmsgs); - if (i2c->nmsgs > 1) { + /* Don't move onto the next message until the TX FIFO empties, + * to ensure that a NAK is not missed. + */ + if (i2c->nmsgs > 1 && (pend & XIIC_INTR_TX_EMPTY_MASK)) { i2c->nmsgs--; i2c->tx_msg++; xfer_more = 1; @@ -790,11 +793,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xiic_process(int irq, void *dev_id) "%s Got TX IRQ but no more to do...\n", __func__); } - } else if (!xiic_tx_space(i2c) && (i2c->nmsgs == 1)) - /* current frame is sent and is last, - * make sure to disable tx half - */ - xiic_irq_dis(i2c, XIIC_INTR_TX_HALF_MASK); + } } if (pend & XIIC_INTR_BNB_MASK) { |