drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.

This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.

v8:
 - Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
 - Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
   intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)

v9:
 - Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)

v10:
 - Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
   to avoid potential issues (Joonas)

v13:
 - Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)

Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ads.c
index ac627534667d..334cb5202e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ads.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_ads.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void guc_policies_init(struct guc_policies *policies)
 int intel_guc_ads_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
-	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	struct i915_vma *vma, *kernel_ctx_vma;
 	struct page *page;
 	/* The ads obj includes the struct itself and buffers passed to GuC */
 	struct {
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ int intel_guc_ads_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	 * to find it. Note that we have to skip our header (1 page),
 	 * because our GuC shared data is there.
 	 */
+	kernel_ctx_vma = dev_priv->kernel_context->engine[RCS].state;
 	blob->ads.golden_context_lrca =
-		guc_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->kernel_context->engine[RCS].state) +
-		skipped_offset;
+		intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, kernel_ctx_vma) + skipped_offset;
 
 	/*
 	 * The GuC expects us to exclude the portion of the context image that
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int intel_guc_ads_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
 		blob->ads.eng_state_size[engine->guc_id] =
 			engine->context_size - skipped_size;
 
-	base = guc_ggtt_offset(vma);
+	base = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, vma);
 	blob->ads.scheduler_policies = base + ptr_offset(blob, policies);
 	blob->ads.reg_state_buffer = base + ptr_offset(blob, reg_state_buffer);
 	blob->ads.reg_state_addr = base + ptr_offset(blob, reg_state);