summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cdrom
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-03-05 13:51:37 +0300
committerLucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>2020-03-05 14:15:46 +0300
commit1442d81fef9955f362ed64b3da7a9d885cd09205 (patch)
treef8ae865272e60e3f07838274fe9fd4b5013b06e8 /drivers/cdrom
parent78f2bfa3181cd7ee134274aa17177dd933c69dc1 (diff)
downloadlinux-1442d81fef9955f362ed64b3da7a9d885cd09205.tar.xz
drm/etnaviv: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cdrom')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions