summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/t10-pi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>2024-03-05 03:28:22 +0300
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2024-03-06 17:02:09 +0300
commit8ca1836769d758e4fbf5851bb81e181c52193f5d (patch)
treeb79e3627e5e74b8bd5b0a9ee98fb4eeac999290f /block/t10-pi.c
parenta184d9835a0a689261ea6a4a8dbc18173a031b77 (diff)
downloadlinux-8ca1836769d758e4fbf5851bb81e181c52193f5d.tar.xz
timer/migration: Fix quick check reporting late expiry
When a CPU is the last active in the hierarchy and it tries to enter into idle, the quick check looking up the next event towards cpuidle heuristics may report a too late expiry, such as in the following scenario: [GRP1:0] migrator = NONE active = NONE nextevt = T0:0, T0:1 / \ [GRP0:0] [GRP0:1] migrator = NONE migrator = NONE active = NONE active = NONE nextevt = T0, T1 nextevt = T2 / \ / \ 0 1 2 3 idle idle idle idle 0) The whole system is idle, and CPU 0 was the last migrator. CPU 0 has a timer (T0), CPU 1 has a timer (T1) and CPU 2 has a timer (T2). The expire order is T0 < T1 < T2. [GRP1:0] migrator = GRP0:0 active = GRP0:0 nextevt = T0:0(i), T0:1 / \ [GRP0:0] [GRP0:1] migrator = CPU0 migrator = NONE active = CPU0 active = NONE nextevt = T0(i), T1 nextevt = T2 / \ / \ 0 1 2 3 active idle idle idle 1) CPU 0 becomes active. The (i) means a now ignored timer. [GRP1:0] migrator = GRP0:0 active = GRP0:0 nextevt = T0:1 / \ [GRP0:0] [GRP0:1] migrator = CPU0 migrator = NONE active = CPU0 active = NONE nextevt = T1 nextevt = T2 / \ / \ 0 1 2 3 active idle idle idle 2) CPU 0 handles remote. No timer actually expired but ignored timers have been cleaned out and their sibling's timers haven't been propagated. As a result the top level's next event is T2 and not T1. 3) CPU 0 tries to enter idle without any global timer enqueued and calls tmigr_quick_check(). The expiry of T2 is returned instead of the expiry of T1. When the quick check returns an expiry that is too late, the cpuidle governor may pick up a C-state that is too deep. This may be result into undesired CPU wake up latency if the next timer is actually close enough. Fix this with assuming that expiries aren't sorted top-down while performing the quick check. Pick up instead the earliest encountered one while walking up the hierarchy. 7ee988770326 ("timers: Implement the hierarchical pull model") Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240305002822.18130-1-frederic@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'block/t10-pi.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions