summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2018-12-06 03:30:30 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2018-12-06 03:30:30 +0300
commite37d05a538a6656e108f7704ad66e1ccc13d6f68 (patch)
tree139001db1e7f6bc6a19c6766ee3285d9a8d8de0b /arch
parent22f6bbb7bcfcef0b373b0502a7ff390275c575dd (diff)
parenta92a72a24d48080f6c49bb514c082fbb1e5bf8fc (diff)
downloadlinux-e37d05a538a6656e108f7704ad66e1ccc13d6f68.tar.xz
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf 2018-12-05 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree. The main changes are: 1) fix bpf uapi pointers for 32-bit architectures, from Daniel. 2) improve verifer ability to handle progs with a lot of branches, from Alexei. 3) strict btf checks, from Yonghong. 4) bpf_sk_lookup api cleanup, from Joe. 5) other misc fixes ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c66
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 17482f5de3e2..9393e231cbc2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -891,6 +891,55 @@ cond_branch:
return 0;
}
+/* Fix the branch target addresses for subprog calls */
+static int bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
+ struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs)
+{
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn = fp->insnsi;
+ bool func_addr_fixed;
+ u64 func_addr;
+ u32 tmp_idx;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < fp->len; i++) {
+ /*
+ * During the extra pass, only the branch target addresses for
+ * the subprog calls need to be fixed. All other instructions
+ * can left untouched.
+ *
+ * The JITed image length does not change because we already
+ * ensure that the JITed instruction sequence for these calls
+ * are of fixed length by padding them with NOPs.
+ */
+ if (insn[i].code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) &&
+ insn[i].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) {
+ ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(fp, &insn[i], true,
+ &func_addr,
+ &func_addr_fixed);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Save ctx->idx as this would currently point to the
+ * end of the JITed image and set it to the offset of
+ * the instruction sequence corresponding to the
+ * subprog call temporarily.
+ */
+ tmp_idx = ctx->idx;
+ ctx->idx = addrs[i] / 4;
+ bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr);
+
+ /*
+ * Restore ctx->idx here. This is safe as the length
+ * of the JITed sequence remains unchanged.
+ */
+ ctx->idx = tmp_idx;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
struct powerpc64_jit_data {
struct bpf_binary_header *header;
u32 *addrs;
@@ -989,6 +1038,22 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
skip_init_ctx:
code_base = (u32 *)(image + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE);
+ if (extra_pass) {
+ /*
+ * Do not touch the prologue and epilogue as they will remain
+ * unchanged. Only fix the branch target address for subprog
+ * calls in the body.
+ *
+ * This does not change the offsets and lengths of the subprog
+ * call instruction sequences and hence, the size of the JITed
+ * image as well.
+ */
+ bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs);
+
+ /* There is no need to perform the usual passes. */
+ goto skip_codegen_passes;
+ }
+
/* Code generation passes 1-2 */
for (pass = 1; pass < 3; pass++) {
/* Now build the prologue, body code & epilogue for real. */
@@ -1002,6 +1067,7 @@ skip_init_ctx:
proglen - (cgctx.idx * 4), cgctx.seen);
}
+skip_codegen_passes:
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
/*
* Note that we output the base address of the code_base