summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/boot
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>2020-05-21 21:57:07 +0300
committerGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>2020-05-25 11:55:56 +0300
commit3381df0954199458fa3993db72fb427f0ed1e43b (patch)
tree59af751ac0fc295222cc2311cd68f498d9ddd4d5 /arch/powerpc/boot
parent2941a4731fd24d5e43ef437cca90818f87fd4851 (diff)
downloadlinux-3381df0954199458fa3993db72fb427f0ed1e43b.tar.xz
m68k: tools: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200521185707.GA3661@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/boot')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions