cris: push down BKL into some device drivers

A number of cris specific device drivers still use the
locked ->ioctl operation. Convert them to unlocked_ioctl
with explicit lock_kernel calls.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>

2 files changed, 30 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c
index 77630df94343..884275629ef7 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/ds1302.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
 #include <linux/bcd.h>
 #include <linux/capability.h>
 
@@ -238,9 +239,7 @@ static unsigned char days_in_mo[] =
 
 /* ioctl that supports RTC_RD_TIME and RTC_SET_TIME (read and set time/date). */
 
-static int
-rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
-	  unsigned long arg) 
+static int rtc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -354,6 +353,17 @@ rtc_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 	}
 }
 
+static long rtc_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	lock_kernel();
+	ret = rtc_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
+	unlock_kernel();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void
 print_rtc_status(void)
 {
@@ -375,8 +385,8 @@ print_rtc_status(void)
 /* The various file operations we support. */
 
 static const struct file_operations rtc_fops = {
-	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
-	.ioctl =	rtc_ioctl,
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.unlocked_ioctl = rtc_unlocked_ioctl,
 }; 
 
 /* Probe for the chip by writing something to its RAM and try reading it back. */
diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c
index 1e90c1a9c849..7dcb1f85f42b 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/drivers/pcf8563.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/bcd.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rtc_lock); /* Protect state etc */
 static const unsigned char days_in_month[] =
 	{ 0, 31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31 };
 
-int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
+static long pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
 
 /* Cache VL bit value read at driver init since writing the RTC_SECOND
  * register clears the VL status.
@@ -62,7 +63,7 @@ static int voltage_low;
 
 static const struct file_operations pcf8563_fops = {
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
-	.ioctl = pcf8563_ioctl,
+	.unlocked_ioctl = pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl,
 };
 
 unsigned char
@@ -212,8 +213,7 @@ pcf8563_exit(void)
  * ioctl calls for this driver. Why return -ENOTTY upon error? Because
  * POSIX says so!
  */
-int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
-	unsigned long arg)
+static int pcf8563_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
 	/* Some sanity checks. */
 	if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != RTC_MAGIC)
@@ -339,6 +339,17 @@ int pcf8563_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static long pcf8563_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	lock_kernel();
+	return pcf8563_ioctl(filp, cmd, arg);
+	unlock_kernel();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __init pcf8563_register(void)
 {
 	if (pcf8563_init() < 0) {