diff options
author | Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> | 2023-06-06 09:59:19 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> | 2023-06-14 17:44:11 +0300 |
commit | b104dbedbe61d89a933479f8effce6409037ef73 (patch) | |
tree | 35c36b3f1f826077d50fa40d2614b6e69d312f56 /Documentation/riscv | |
parent | 99a670b2069c725a7b50318aa681d9cae8f89325 (diff) | |
download | linux-b104dbedbe61d89a933479f8effce6409037ef73.tar.xz |
Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: mention patchwork's role
Palmer suggested at some point, not sure if it was in one of the
weekly linux-riscv syncs, or a conversation at FOSDEM, that we
should document the role of the automation running on our patchwork
instance plays in patch acceptance.
Add a short note to the patch-acceptance document to that end.
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606-rehab-monsoon-12c17bbe08e3@wendy
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/riscv')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst index 07d5a5623e2a..634aa222b410 100644 --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst @@ -16,6 +16,24 @@ tested code over experimental code. We wish to extend these same principles to the RISC-V-related code that will be accepted for inclusion in the kernel. +Patchwork +--------- + +RISC-V has a patchwork instance, where the status of patches can be checked: + + https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ + +If your patch does not appear in the default view, the RISC-V maintainers have +likely either requested changes, or expect it to be applied to another tree. + +Automation runs against this patchwork instance, building/testing patches as +they arrive. The automation applies patches against the current HEAD of the +RISC-V `for-next` and `fixes` branches, depending on whether the patch has been +detected as a fix. Failing those, it will use the RISC-V `master` branch. +The exact commit to which a series has been applied will be noted on patchwork. +Patches for which any of the checks fail are unlikely to be applied and in most +cases will need to be resubmitted. + Submit Checklist Addendum ------------------------- We'll only accept patches for new modules or extensions if the |