diff options
author | Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> | 2017-12-08 16:13:44 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2018-01-08 17:41:06 +0300 |
commit | 9a9b8b4b2271e763c1600311a3d4ecc2ac359b55 (patch) | |
tree | ab3a2dca1dc0e5af42f9473958aefd67463fb7d6 | |
parent | 13a70f350665580708ab11f725d3578eaacbf2d0 (diff) | |
download | linux-9a9b8b4b2271e763c1600311a3d4ecc2ac359b55.tar.xz |
perf tools: Create function to perform multiple time range checking
Previous patch supports the multiple time range.
For example, select the first and second 10% time slices.
perf report --time 10%/1,10%/2
We need a function to check if a timestamp is in the ranges of
[0, 10%) and [10%, 20%].
Note that it includes the last element in [10%, 20%] but it doesn't
include the last element in [0, 10%). It's to avoid the overlap.
This patch implments a new function perf_time__ranges_skip_sample
for this checking.
Change log:
v4: Let perf_time__ranges_skip_sample be compatible with
perf_time__skip_sample when only one time range.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512738826-2628-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r-- | tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 28 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/perf/util/time-utils.h | 3 |
2 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c index 61c46022de0b..3f7f18f06982 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c @@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp) return false; } +bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, + int num, u64 timestamp) +{ + struct perf_time_interval *ptime; + int i; + + if ((timestamp == 0) || (num == 0)) + return false; + + if (num == 1) + return perf_time__skip_sample(&ptime_buf[0], timestamp); + + /* + * start/end of multiple time ranges must be valid. + */ + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + ptime = &ptime_buf[i]; + + if (timestamp >= ptime->start && + ((timestamp < ptime->end && i < num - 1) || + (timestamp <= ptime->end && i == num - 1))) { + break; + } + } + + return (i == num) ? true : false; +} + int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz) { u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h index 23087231785a..34d5eba26bf5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int perf_time__percent_parse_str(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, int num, bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp); +bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, + int num, u64 timestamp); + int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz); int fetch_current_timestamp(char *buf, size_t sz); |