summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print key types as human readable stringsFilipe Manana1-2/+66
Looking at a leaf dump from the kernel's print-tree implementation is not so friendly to analyze since key types are printed as numbers. Improve on this by printing key types as strings that are a diminutive of the macro names for key types, just like we do in btrfs-progs. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: move code for processing file extent item into helperFilipe Manana1-23/+29
The code for processing file extent items is quite large and it's better to have it in a dedicated helper rather than in a huge switch statement, just like we do in btrfs-progs. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print compression type for file extent itemsFilipe Manana1-2/+5
We are not printing anything about the compression type, so add that useful information in the same format as btrfs-progs. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print correct inline extent data sizeFilipe Manana1-2/+4
We are advertising the ram_bytes of an inline extent as its data size, but that is not true for compressed extents. The ram_bytes corresponds to the uncompressed data size while the data size (compressed data) is given by btrfs_file_extent_inline_item_len(). So fix this and print both values in the same format as in btrfs-progs. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print range information for extent csum itemsFilipe Manana1-0/+15
Currently we don't print anything for extent csum items other than the generic line with the key, item offset and item size. While one can still determine the range the extent csum covers by doing a few simple computations, it makes it more time consuming to analyse a leaf dump. So add a line that prints information about the range covered by the checksum using the same format as btrfs-progs. This is useful when debugging log tree issues since we log extent csum items for new extents. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print information about dir log itemsFilipe Manana1-0/+11
We currently don't print information about dir log items (other than the key, item offset and item size), which is useful to look at when debugging problems with a log tree. So print their specific information (currently they only have an end index number) in a format similar to btrfs-progs. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print information about inode extref itemsFilipe Manana1-0/+23
Currently we ignore inode extref items, we just print their key, item offset in the leaf and their size, no information about their content like the index number, parent inode, name length and name. Improve on this by printing the index, parent and name length in the same format as btrfs-progs. Note that we don't print the name, as that would require some processing and escaping like we do in btrfs-progs, and that could expose sensitive information for some users in case they share their dmesg/syslog and it contains a leaf dump. So for now leave names out. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print information about inode ref itemsFilipe Manana1-0/+20
Currently we ignore inode ref items, we just print their key, item offset in the leaf and their size, no information about their content like the index number, name length and name. Improve on this by printing the index and name length in the same format as btrfs-progs. Note that we don't print the name, as that would require some processing and escaping like we do in btrfs-progs, and that could expose sensitive information for some users in case they share their dmesg/syslog and it contains a leaf dump. So for now leave names out. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print dir items for dir index and xattr keys tooFilipe Manana1-0/+2
Currently we only print the dir items for BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY keys, but we also have dir items for BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY and BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY keys too. So print them for those keys too. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print more information about dir itemsFilipe Manana1-7/+24
Currently we only print the object id component of the location key from a dir item and the flags. We are missing the whole key, transid and the name and data lengths. We are also ignoring the fact that we can have multiple dir item objects encoded in a single item for a BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY key, so what we print is only for the first item. Improve on this by iterating on all dir items and print the missing information. This is done with the same format as in btrfs-progs, what we miss is printing the names and data since not only that would require some processing and escaping like in btrfs-progs, but it would also reveal information that may be sensitive and users may not want to share that in case that get a leaf dumped in dmesg. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
12 daysbtrfs: print-tree: print missing fields for inode itemsFilipe Manana1-6/+31
We are not dumping a lot of fields for an inode item which are useful for debugging whenever we dump a leaf (log replay failure for example), so add them and make it as close as possible to the print tree implementation in btrfs-progs (things like converting timespecs to human readable dates and converting flags to strings are missing since they are not so practical to do in the kernel). Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-07-22btrfs: use our message helpers instead of pr_err/pr_warn/pr_infoDavid Sterba1-1/+1
Our message helpers accept NULL for the fs_info in the context that does not provide and print the common header of the message. The use of pr_* helpers is only for special reasons, like module loading, device scanning or multi-line output (print-tree). Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-07-22btrfs: use refcount_t type for the extent buffer reference counterFilipe Manana1-1/+1
Instead of using a bare atomic, use the refcount_t type, which despite being a structure that contains only an atomic, has an API that checks for underflows and other hazards. This doesn't change the size of the extent_buffer structure. This removes the need to do things like this: WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->refs) == 0); if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->refs)) { (...) } And do just: if (refcount_dec_and_test(&eb->refs)) { (...) } Since refcount_dec_and_test() already triggers a warning when we decrement a ref count that has a value of 0 (or below zero). Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-08-02btrfs: avoid using fixed char array size for tree namesQu Wenruo1-1/+1
[BUG] There is a bug report that using the latest trunk GCC 15, btrfs would cause unterminated-string-initialization warning: linux-6.6/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:29:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminated-string-initialization] 29 | { BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TREE_OBJECTID, "BLOCK_GROUP_TREE" }, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [CAUSE] To print tree names we have an array of root_name_map structure, which uses "char name[16];" to store the name string of a tree. But the following trees have names exactly at 16 chars length: - "BLOCK_GROUP_TREE" - "RAID_STRIPE_TREE" This means we will have no space for the terminating '\0', and can lead to unexpected access when printing the name. [FIX] Instead of "char name[16];" use "const char *" instead. Since the name strings are all read-only data, and are all NULL terminated by default, there is not much need to bother the length at all. Reported-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Reported-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> Fixes: edde81f1abf29 ("btrfs: add raid stripe tree pretty printer") Fixes: 9c54e80ddc6bd ("btrfs: add code to support the block group root") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: remove raid-stripe-tree encoding field from stripe_extentJohannes Thumshirn1-5/+0
Remove the encoding field from 'struct btrfs_stripe_extent'. It was originally intended to encode the RAID type as well as if we're a data or a parity stripe. But the RAID type can be inferred form the block-group and the data vs. parity differentiation can be done easier with adding a new key type for parity stripes in the RAID stripe tree. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: print-tree: add generation and type dump for EXTENT_DATA_KEYQu Wenruo1-0/+3
When debugging the recent ram_bytes mismatch bug, I can hit it with enhanced tree-checker for file extent items at write time. But the bug is not that easy to trigger (mostly triggered with btrfs/06*, which uses 20 threads fsstress), and when I hit it, the only info is the kernel leaf dump, but it doesn't include things like the file extent type (REGULAR or PREALLOC). Add the dump for generation and type (although only numeric output) to make debugging a little easier. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: only print error message when checking item size in print_extent_item()David Sterba1-1/+1
The extent item used to have a v0 that was removed in 6.6. There's a check for minimum expected size that could lead to btrfs_handle_fs_error() that would make the filesystem read-only. As we don't have v0 anymore (and haven't seen any reports in the deprecation period), handle this in a less intrusive way. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: new inline ref storing owning subvol of data extentsBoris Burkov1-0/+12
In order to implement simple quota groups, we need to be able to associate a data extent with the subvolume that created it. Once you account for reflink, this information cannot be recovered without explicitly storing it. Options for storing it are: - a new key/item - a new extent inline ref item The former is backwards compatible, but wastes space, the latter is incompat, but is efficient in space and reuses the existing inline ref machinery, while only abusing it a tiny amount -- specifically, the new item is not a ref, per-se. Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: add raid stripe tree pretty printerJohannes Thumshirn1-0/+23
Decode raid-stripe-tree entries on btrfs_print_tree(). Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-21btrfs: remove v0 extent handlingQu Wenruo1-6/+4
The v0 extent item has been deprecated for a long time, and we don't have any report from the community either. So it's time to remove the v0 extent specific error handling, and just treat them as regular extent tree corruption. This patch would remove the btrfs_print_v0_err() helper, and enhance the involved error handling to treat them just as any extent tree corruption. No reports regarding v0 extents have been seen since the graceful handling was added in 2018. This involves: - btrfs_backref_add_tree_node() This change is a little tricky, the new code is changed to only handle BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY. But this is safe, as we have rejected any unknown inline refs through btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type(). For keyed backrefs, we're safe to skip anything we don't know (that's if it can pass tree-checker in the first place). - btrfs_lookup_extent_info() - lookup_inline_extent_backref() - run_delayed_extent_op() - __btrfs_free_extent() - add_tree_block() Regular error handling of unexpected extent tree item, and abort transaction (if we have a trans handle). - remove_extent_data_ref() It's pretty much the same as the regular rejection of unknown backref key. But for this particular case, we can also remove a BUG_ON(). - extent_data_ref_count() We can remove the BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY BUG_ON(), as it would be rejected by the only caller. - btrfs_print_leaf() Remove the handling for BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19btrfs: print-tree: pass const extent buffer pointerQu Wenruo1-8/+8
Since print-tree infrastructure only prints the content of a tree block, we can make them to accept const extent buffer pointer. This removes a forced type convert in extent-tree, where we convert a const extent buffer pointer to regular one, just to avoid compiler warning. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-05-09btrfs: print-tree: parent bytenr must be aligned to sector sizeAnastasia Belova1-3/+3
Check nodesize to sectorsize in alignment check in print_extent_item. The comment states that and this is correct, similar check is done elsewhere in the functions. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: ea57788eb76d ("btrfs: require only sector size alignment for parent eb bytenr") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move struct btrfs_tree_parent_check out of disk-io.hChristoph Hellwig1-0/+1
Move struct btrfs_tree_parent_check out of disk-io.h so that volumes.h an various .c files don't have to include disk-io.h just for it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ use tree-checker.h for the structure ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: concentrate all tree block parentness check parameters into one structureQu Wenruo1-6/+8
There are several different tree block parentness check parameters used across several helpers: - level Mandatory - transid Under most cases it's mandatory, but there are several backref cases which skips this check. - owner_root - first_key Utilized by most top-down tree search routine. Otherwise can be skipped. Those four members are not always mandatory checks, and some of them are the same u64, which means if some arguments got swapped compiler will not catch it. Furthermore if we're going to further expand the parentness check, we need to modify quite some helpers just to add one more parameter. This patch will concentrate all these members into a structure called btrfs_tree_parent_check, and pass that structure for the following helpers: - btrfs_read_extent_buffer() - read_tree_block() Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: extend btrfs_dir_item type to store encryption statusOmar Sandoval1-2/+2
For directories with encrypted files/filenames, we need to store a flag indicating this fact. There's no room in other fields, so we'll need to borrow a bit from dir_type. Since it's now a combination of type and flags, we rename it to dir_flags to reflect its new usage. The new flag, FT_ENCRYPTED, indicates a directory containing encrypted data, which is orthogonal to file type; therefore, add the new flag, and make conversion from directory type to file type strip the flag. As the file types almost never change we can afford to use the bits. Actual usage will be guarded behind an incompat bit, this patch only adds the support for later use by fscrypt. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.hJosef Bacik1-0/+1
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so everything compiles. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comments, style fixups ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move the printk helpers out of ctree.hJosef Bacik1-0/+1
We have a bunch of printk helpers that are in ctree.h. These have nothing to do with ctree.c, so move them into their own header. Subsequent patches will cleanup the printk helpers. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: unify the error handling pattern for read_tree_block()Qu Wenruo1-2/+2
We had an error handling pattern for read_tree_block() like this: eb = read_tree_block(); if (IS_ERR(eb)) { /* * Handling error here * Normally ended up with return or goto out. */ } else if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) { /* * Different error handling here * Normally also ended up with return or goto out; */ } This is fine, but if we want to add extra check for each read_tree_block(), the existing if-else-if is not that expandable and will take reader some seconds to figure out there is no extra branch. Here we change it to a more common way, without the extra else: eb = read_tree_block(); if (IS_ERR(eb)) { /* * Handling error here */ return eb or goto out; } if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb)) { /* * Different error handling here */ return eb or goto out; } This also removes some oddball call sites which uses some creative way to check error. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-03-14btrfs: add code to support the block group rootJosef Bacik1-0/+1
This code adds the on disk structures for the block group root, which will hold the block group items for extent tree v2. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: drop the _nr from the item helpersJosef Bacik1-3/+3
Now that all call sites are using the slot number to modify item values, rename the SETGET helpers to raw_item_*(), and then rework the _nr() helpers to be the btrfs_item_*() btrfs_set_item_*() helpers, and then rename all of the callers to the new helpers. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: use btrfs_item_size_nr/btrfs_item_offset_nr everywhereJosef Bacik1-3/+1
We have this pattern in a lot of places item = btrfs_item_nr(slot); btrfs_item_size(leaf, item); when we could simply use btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot); Fix all callers of btrfs_item_size() and btrfs_item_offset() to use the _nr variation of the helpers. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-01-07btrfs: print the actual offset in btrfs_root_nameJosef Bacik1-5/+5
We're supposed to print the root_key.offset in btrfs_root_name in the case of a reloc root, not the objectid. Fix this helper to take the key so we have access to the offset when we need it. Fixes: 457f1864b569 ("btrfs: pretty print leaked root name") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-12-08btrfs: pass root owner to read_tree_blockJosef Bacik1-0/+1
In order to properly set the lockdep class of a newly allocated block we need to know the owner of the block. For non-refcounted trees this is straightforward, we always know in advance what tree we're reading from. For refcounted trees we don't necessarily know, however all refcounted trees share the same lockdep class name, tree-<level>. Fix all the callers of read_tree_block() to pass in the root objectid we're using. In places like relocation and backref we could probably unconditionally use 0, but just in case use the root when we have it, otherwise use 0 in the cases we don't have the root as it's going to be a refcounted tree anyway. This is a preparation patch for further changes. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-12-08btrfs: remove unnecessary casts in printkDavid Sterba1-2/+1
Long time ago the explicit casts were necessary for u64 but we don't need it. Remove casts where the type matches, leaving only cases that cast sector_t or loff_t. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-12-08btrfs: switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphoreJosef Bacik1-9/+2
Historically we've implemented our own locking because we wanted to be able to selectively spin or sleep based on what we were doing in the tree. For instance, if all of our nodes were in cache then there's rarely a reason to need to sleep waiting for node locks, as they'll likely become available soon. At the time this code was written the rw_semaphore didn't do adaptive spinning, and thus was orders of magnitude slower than our home grown locking. However now the opposite is the case. There are a few problems with how we implement blocking locks, namely that we use a normal waitqueue and simply wake everybody up in reverse sleep order. This leads to some suboptimal performance behavior, and a lot of context switches in highly contended cases. The rw_semaphores actually do this properly, and also have adaptive spinning that works relatively well. The locking code is also a bit of a bear to understand, and we lose the benefit of lockdep for the most part because the blocking states of the lock are simply ad-hoc and not mapped into lockdep. So rework the locking code to drop all of this custom locking stuff, and simply use a rw_semaphore for everything. This makes the locking much simpler for everything, as we can now drop a lot of cruft and blocking transitions. The performance numbers vary depending on the workload, because generally speaking there doesn't tend to be a lot of contention on the btree. However, on my test system which is an 80 core single socket system with 256GiB of RAM and a 2TiB NVMe drive I get the following results (with all debug options off): dbench 200 baseline Throughput 216.056 MB/sec 200 clients 200 procs max_latency=1471.197 ms dbench 200 with patch Throughput 737.188 MB/sec 200 clients 200 procs max_latency=714.346 ms Previously we also used fs_mark to test this sort of contention, and those results are far less impressive, mostly because there's not enough tasks to really stress the locking fs_mark -d /d[0-15] -S 0 -L 20 -n 100000 -s 0 -t 16 baseline Average Files/sec: 160166.7 p50 Files/sec: 165832 p90 Files/sec: 123886 p99 Files/sec: 123495 real 3m26.527s user 2m19.223s sys 48m21.856s patched Average Files/sec: 164135.7 p50 Files/sec: 171095 p90 Files/sec: 122889 p99 Files/sec: 113819 real 3m29.660s user 2m19.990s sys 44m12.259s Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-07btrfs: pretty print leaked root nameJosef Bacik1-0/+38
I'm a actual human being so am incapable of converting u64 to s64 in my head, so add a helper to get the pretty name of a root objectid and use that helper to spit out the name for any special roots for leaked roots, so I don't have to scratch my head and figure out which root I messed up the refs for. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-09-07btrfs: require only sector size alignment for parent eb bytenrQu Wenruo1-5/+7
[BUG] A completely sane converted fs will cause kernel warning at balance time: [ 1557.188633] BTRFS info (device sda7): relocating block group 8162107392 flags data [ 1563.358078] BTRFS info (device sda7): found 11722 extents [ 1563.358277] BTRFS info (device sda7): leaf 7989321728 gen 95 total ptrs 213 free space 3458 owner 2 [ 1563.358280] item 0 key (7984947200 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [ 1563.358281] extent refs 1 gen 90 flags 2 [ 1563.358282] ref#0: tree block backref root 4 [ 1563.358285] item 1 key (7985602560 169 0) itemoff 16217 itemsize 33 [ 1563.358286] extent refs 1 gen 93 flags 258 [ 1563.358287] ref#0: shared block backref parent 7985602560 [ 1563.358288] (parent 7985602560 is NOT ALIGNED to nodesize 16384) [ 1563.358290] item 2 key (7985635328 169 0) itemoff 16184 itemsize 33 ... [ 1563.358995] BTRFS error (device sda7): eb 7989321728 invalid extent inline ref type 182 [ 1563.358996] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1563.359005] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 2930 at 0xffffffff9f231766 Then with transaction abort, and obviously failed to balance the fs. [CAUSE] That mentioned inline ref type 182 is completely sane, it's BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, it's some extra check making kernel to believe it's invalid. Commit 64ecdb647ddb ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type") introduced extra checks for backref type. One of the requirement is, parent bytenr must be aligned to node size, which is not correct. One example is like this: 0 1G 1G+4K 2G 2G+4K | |///////////////////|//| <- A chunk starts at 1G+4K | | <- A tree block get reserved at bytenr 1G+4K Then we have a valid tree block at bytenr 1G+4K, but not aligned to nodesize (16K). Such chunk is not ideal, but current kernel can handle it pretty well. We may warn about such tree block in the future, but should not reject them. [FIX] Change the alignment requirement from node size alignment to sector size alignment. Also, to make our lives a little easier, also output @iref when btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type() failed, so we can locate the item easier. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205475 Fixes: 64ecdb647ddb ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ update comments and messages ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-20btrfs: Remove unneeded semicolonzhengbin1-1/+1
Fixes coccicheck warning: fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:320:3-4: Unneeded semicolon Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: rename extent buffer block group item accessorsDavid Sterba1-3/+3
Accessors defined by BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS take a raw extent buffer and manipulate the items there, there's no special prefix required. The block group accessors had _disk_ because previously the names were occupied by the on-stack accessors. As this has been addressed in the previous patch, we can now unify the naming. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: switch extent_buffer write_locks from atomic to intDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The write_locks is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: switch extent_buffer spinning_writers from atomic to intDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The spinning_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: switch extent_buffer blocking_writers from atomic to intDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The blocking_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: get fs_info from eb in btrfs_leaf_free_spaceDavid Sterba1-1/+1
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: annotate unlikely branches after V0 extent type removalDavid Sterba1-1/+1
The v0 extent type checks are the right case for the unlikely annotations as we don't expect to ever see them, so let's give the compiler some hint. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Add graceful handling of V0 extentsNikolay Borisov1-3/+6
Following the removal of the v0 handling code let's be courteous and print an error message when such extents are handled. In the cases where we have a transaction just abort it, otherwise just call btrfs_handle_fs_error. Both cases result in the FS being re-mounted RO. In case the error handling would be too intrusive, leave the BUG_ON in place, like extent_data_ref_count, other proper handling would catch that earlier. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Remove V0 extent supportNikolay Borisov1-29/+1
The v0 compat code was introduced in commit 5d4f98a28c7d ("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)") 9 years ago, which was merged in 2.6.31. This means that the code is there to support filesystems which are _VERY_ old and if you are using btrfs on such an old kernel, you have much bigger problems. This coupled with the fact that no one is likely testing/maintining this code likely means it has bugs lurking. All things considered I think 43 kernel releases later it's high time this remnant of the past got removed. This patch removes all code wrapped in #ifdefs but leaves the BUG_ONs in case we have a v0 with no support intact as a sort of safety-net. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_lenQu Wenruo1-2/+2
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed data size of an inlined extent. However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item. While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely. In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug. Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len(). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-28btrfs: print-tree: Add eb locking status output for debug buildQu Wenruo1-0/+21
It's pretty handy if we can get the debug output for locking status of an extent buffer, specially for race condition related debugging. So add the following output for btrfs_print_tree() and btrfs_print_leaf(): - refs - write_locks (as w:%d) - read_locks (as r:%d) - blocking_writers (as bw:%d) - blocking_readers (as br:%d) - spinning_writers (as sw:%d) - spinning_readers (as sr:%d) - lock_owner - current->pid Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update comment ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-20btrfs: print-tree: debugging output enhancementQu Wenruo1-10/+15
This patch enhances the following things: - tree block header * add generation and owner output for node and leaf - node pointer generation output - allow btrfs_print_tree() to not follow nodes * just like btrfs-progs Please note that, although function btrfs_print_tree() is not called by anyone right now, it's still a pretty useful function to debug kernel. So that function is still kept for later use. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-12btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- sourcesDavid Sterba1-14/+1
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest, ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the SPDX header. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>