diff options
author | Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> | 2015-09-03 17:07:38 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2015-09-06 17:32:43 +0300 |
commit | aca6ff29c4063a8d467cdee241e6b3bf7dc4a171 (patch) | |
tree | e006ea14ead8ae95add04f135dd332bdcbea4bdf /virt | |
parent | 19020f8ab83de9dc5a9c8af1f321a526f38bbc40 (diff) | |
download | linux-aca6ff29c4063a8d467cdee241e6b3bf7dc4a171.tar.xz |
KVM: dynamic halt-polling
There is a downside of always-poll since poll is still happened for idle
vCPUs which can waste cpu usage. This patchset add the ability to adjust
halt_poll_ns dynamically, to grow halt_poll_ns when shot halt is detected,
and to shrink halt_poll_ns when long halt is detected.
There are two new kernel parameters for changing the halt_poll_ns:
halt_poll_ns_grow and halt_poll_ns_shrink.
no-poll always-poll dynamic-poll
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Idle (nohz) vCPU %c0 0.15% 0.3% 0.2%
Idle (250HZ) vCPU %c0 1.1% 4.6%~14% 1.2%
TCP_RR latency 34us 27us 26.7us
"Idle (X) vCPU %c0" is the percent of time the physical cpu spent in
c0 over 60 seconds (each vCPU is pinned to a pCPU). (nohz) means the
guest was tickless. (250HZ) means the guest was ticking at 250HZ.
The big win is with ticking operating systems. Running the linux guest
with nohz=off (and HZ=250), we save 3.4%~12.8% CPUs/second and get close
to no-polling overhead levels by using the dynamic-poll. The savings
should be even higher for higher frequency ticks.
Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
[Simplify the patch. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt')
-rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 53 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index c06e57cd1269..8ab49cfc024e 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -66,9 +66,18 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Qumranet"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -static unsigned int halt_poll_ns; +/* halt polling only reduces halt latency by 5-7 us, 500us is enough */ +static unsigned int halt_poll_ns = 500000; module_param(halt_poll_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR); +/* Default doubles per-vcpu halt_poll_ns. */ +static unsigned int halt_poll_ns_grow = 2; +module_param(halt_poll_ns_grow, int, S_IRUGO); + +/* Default resets per-vcpu halt_poll_ns . */ +static unsigned int halt_poll_ns_shrink; +module_param(halt_poll_ns_shrink, int, S_IRUGO); + /* * Ordering of locks: * @@ -1907,6 +1916,31 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty); +static void grow_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns; + + /* 10us base */ + if (val == 0 && halt_poll_ns_grow) + val = 10000; + else + val *= halt_poll_ns_grow; + + vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val; +} + +static void shrink_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns; + + if (halt_poll_ns_shrink == 0) + val = 0; + else + val /= halt_poll_ns_shrink; + + vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val; +} + static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) { @@ -1929,6 +1963,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) ktime_t start, cur; DEFINE_WAIT(wait); bool waited = false; + u64 block_ns; start = cur = ktime_get(); if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns) { @@ -1961,7 +1996,21 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) cur = ktime_get(); out: - trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start), waited); + block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start); + + if (halt_poll_ns) { + if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns) + ; + /* we had a long block, shrink polling */ + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns) + shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu); + /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */ + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns && + block_ns < halt_poll_ns) + grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu); + } + + trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_block); |