summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIan Rogers <irogers@google.com>2025-01-13 22:43:45 +0300
committerNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>2025-02-13 07:06:11 +0300
commitdc6d2bc2d893a878e7b58578ff01b4738708deb4 (patch)
treeb5524ff4429f1e88533f518753091462bc4bd8b4 /tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
parent08d9e883481b2c38326ed37314b1f6a1284c03d8 (diff)
downloadlinux-dc6d2bc2d893a878e7b58578ff01b4738708deb4.tar.xz
perf sample: Make user_regs and intr_regs optional
The struct dump_regs contains 512 bytes of cache_regs, meaning the two values in perf_sample contribute 1088 bytes of its total 1384 bytes size. Initializing this much memory has a cost reported by Tavian Barnes <tavianator@tavianator.com> as about 2.5% when running `perf script --itrace=i0`: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d841b97b3ad2ca8bcab07e4293375fb7c32dfce7.1736618095.git.tavianator@tavianator.com/ Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> replied that the zero initialization was necessary and couldn't simply be removed. This patch aims to strike a middle ground of still zeroing the perf_sample, but removing 79% of its size by make user_regs and intr_regs optional pointers to zalloc-ed memory. To support the allocation accessors are created for user_regs and intr_regs. To support correct cleanup perf_sample__init and perf_sample__exit functions are created and added throughout the code base. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250113194345.1537821-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c62
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 25a3f6cece50..72411580f869 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@
#define BS_EXPECTED_LE 0x1aa00000000
#define FLAG(s) s->branch_stack->entries[i].flags
-static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
- const struct perf_sample *s2,
+static bool samples_same(struct perf_sample *s1,
+ struct perf_sample *s2,
u64 type, u64 read_format, bool needs_swap)
{
size_t i;
@@ -126,13 +126,15 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
}
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
- size_t sz = hweight_long(s1->user_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
-
- COMP(user_regs.mask);
- COMP(user_regs.abi);
- if (s1->user_regs.abi &&
- (!s1->user_regs.regs || !s2->user_regs.regs ||
- memcmp(s1->user_regs.regs, s2->user_regs.regs, sz))) {
+ struct regs_dump *s1_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(s1);
+ struct regs_dump *s2_regs = perf_sample__user_regs(s2);
+ size_t sz = hweight_long(s1_regs->mask) * sizeof(u64);
+
+ COMP(user_regs->mask);
+ COMP(user_regs->abi);
+ if (s1_regs->abi &&
+ (!s1_regs->regs || !s2_regs->regs ||
+ memcmp(s1_regs->regs, s2_regs->regs, sz))) {
pr_debug("Samples differ at 'user_regs'\n");
return false;
}
@@ -157,13 +159,15 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
COMP(transaction);
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
- size_t sz = hweight_long(s1->intr_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
-
- COMP(intr_regs.mask);
- COMP(intr_regs.abi);
- if (s1->intr_regs.abi &&
- (!s1->intr_regs.regs || !s2->intr_regs.regs ||
- memcmp(s1->intr_regs.regs, s2->intr_regs.regs, sz))) {
+ struct regs_dump *s1_regs = perf_sample__intr_regs(s1);
+ struct regs_dump *s2_regs = perf_sample__intr_regs(s2);
+ size_t sz = hweight_long(s1_regs->mask) * sizeof(u64);
+
+ COMP(intr_regs->mask);
+ COMP(intr_regs->abi);
+ if (s1_regs->abi &&
+ (!s1_regs->regs || !s2_regs->regs ||
+ memcmp(s1_regs->regs, s2_regs->regs, sz))) {
pr_debug("Samples differ at 'intr_regs'\n");
return false;
}
@@ -223,6 +227,16 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
const u32 raw_data[] = {0x12345678, 0x0a0b0c0d, 0x11020304, 0x05060708, 0 };
const u64 data[] = {0x2211443366558877ULL, 0, 0xaabbccddeeff4321ULL};
const u64 aux_data[] = {0xa55a, 0, 0xeeddee, 0x0282028202820282};
+ struct regs_dump user_regs = {
+ .abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64,
+ .mask = sample_regs,
+ .regs = regs,
+ };
+ struct regs_dump intr_regs = {
+ .abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64,
+ .mask = sample_regs,
+ .regs = regs,
+ };
struct perf_sample sample = {
.ip = 101,
.pid = 102,
@@ -241,11 +255,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
.callchain = &callchain.callchain,
.no_hw_idx = false,
.branch_stack = &branch_stack.branch_stack,
- .user_regs = {
- .abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64,
- .mask = sample_regs,
- .regs = regs,
- },
+ .user_regs = &user_regs,
.user_stack = {
.size = sizeof(data),
.data = (void *)data,
@@ -254,11 +264,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
.time_enabled = 0x030a59d664fca7deULL,
.time_running = 0x011b6ae553eb98edULL,
},
- .intr_regs = {
- .abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64,
- .mask = sample_regs,
- .regs = regs,
- },
+ .intr_regs = &intr_regs,
.phys_addr = 113,
.cgroup = 114,
.data_page_size = 115,
@@ -273,6 +279,8 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
size_t i, sz, bufsz;
int err, ret = -1;
+ perf_sample__init(&sample_out, /*all=*/false);
+ perf_sample__init(&sample_out_endian, /*all=*/false);
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)
evsel.core.attr.sample_regs_user = sample_regs;
@@ -361,6 +369,8 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
ret = 0;
out_free:
free(event);
+ perf_sample__exit(&sample_out_endian);
+ perf_sample__exit(&sample_out);
if (ret && read_format)
pr_debug("read_format %#"PRIx64"\n", read_format);
return ret;