diff options
| author | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2023-08-05 00:03:03 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2023-08-05 00:03:04 +0300 |
| commit | eef9630de072a21917ef5cb17ff37e4cf274be88 (patch) | |
| tree | 880c80ff2e990d5ed874876c4b613ad85419c6f7 /net/devlink/dev.c | |
| parent | 86b7e033d684a9d4ca20ad8e6f8b9300cf99668f (diff) | |
| parent | 6e067d0cab68a64ef3488b5639a66b65e91b146d (diff) | |
| download | linux-eef9630de072a21917ef5cb17ff37e4cf274be88.tar.xz | |
Merge branch 'devlink-use-spec-to-generate-split-ops'
Jiri Pirko says:
====================
devlink: use spec to generate split ops
This is an outcome of the discussion in the following thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230720121829.566974-1-jiri@resnulli.us/
It serves as a dependency on the linked selector patchset.
There is an existing spec for devlink used for userspace part
generation. There are two commands supported there.
This patchset extends the spec so kernel split ops code could
be generated from it.
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803111340.1074067-1-jiri@resnulli.us
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/devlink/dev.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/devlink/dev.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/net/devlink/dev.c b/net/devlink/dev.c index bf1d6f1bcfc7..5dfba2248b90 100644 --- a/net/devlink/dev.c +++ b/net/devlink/dev.c @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void devlink_notify(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_command cmd) msg, 0, DEVLINK_MCGRP_CONFIG, GFP_KERNEL); } -int devlink_nl_cmd_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) +int devlink_nl_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0]; struct sk_buff *msg; @@ -217,17 +217,18 @@ int devlink_nl_cmd_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) } static int -devlink_nl_cmd_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink, - struct netlink_callback *cb) +devlink_nl_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink, + struct netlink_callback *cb) { return devlink_nl_fill(msg, devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLM_F_MULTI); } -const struct devlink_cmd devl_cmd_get = { - .dump_one = devlink_nl_cmd_get_dump_one, -}; +int devlink_nl_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg, struct netlink_callback *cb) +{ + return devlink_nl_dumpit(msg, cb, devlink_nl_get_dump_one); +} static void devlink_reload_failed_set(struct devlink *devlink, bool reload_failed) @@ -804,7 +805,7 @@ err_cancel_msg: return err; } -int devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) +int devlink_nl_info_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0]; struct sk_buff *msg; @@ -826,8 +827,8 @@ int devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) } static int -devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink, - struct netlink_callback *cb) +devlink_nl_info_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink, + struct netlink_callback *cb) { int err; @@ -840,9 +841,10 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink, return err; } -const struct devlink_cmd devl_cmd_info_get = { - .dump_one = devlink_nl_cmd_info_get_dump_one, -}; +int devlink_nl_info_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg, struct netlink_callback *cb) +{ + return devlink_nl_dumpit(msg, cb, devlink_nl_info_get_dump_one); +} static int devlink_nl_flash_update_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink, |