bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros

BPF kfuncs are meant to be called from BPF programs. Accordingly, most
kfuncs are not called from anywhere in the kernel, which the
-Wmissing-prototypes warning is unhappy about. We've peppered
__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", ... everywhere kfuncs are
defined in the codebase to suppress this warning.

This patch adds two macros meant to bound one or many kfunc definitions.
All existing kfunc definitions which use these __diag calls to suppress
-Wmissing-prototypes are migrated to use the newly-introduced macros.
A new __diag_ignore_all - for "-Wmissing-declarations" - is added to the
__bpf_kfunc_start_defs macro based on feedback from Andrii on an earlier
version of this patch [0] and another recent mailing list thread [1].

In the future we might need to ignore different warnings or do other
kfunc-specific things. This change will make it easier to make such
modifications for all kfunc defs.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaE5dRWtK6RPLnjTW-MW9sx9K3Fn6uwqCTChK2Dcb1Xig@mail.gmail.com/
  [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZT+2qCc%2FaXep0%2FLf@krava/

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231031215625.2343848-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 0841f8d82419..c9fdcc5cdce1 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -503,9 +503,8 @@ out:
  * architecture dependent calling conventions. 7+ can be supported in the
  * future.
  */
-__diag_push();
-__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
-		  "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
+__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
+
 __bpf_kfunc int bpf_fentry_test1(int a)
 {
 	return a + 1;
@@ -605,7 +604,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release(struct prog_test_member *p)
 {
 }
 
-__diag_pop();
+__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
 
 BTF_SET8_START(bpf_test_modify_return_ids)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test)