summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2023-06-07 12:09:05 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2023-06-07 12:09:05 +0300
commite3144ff52f7d2c884eef352cec9b9ff9acd2eb2f (patch)
treea5898632fd2ce3dd1f7dfca691a0a1f6dfdf1231 /include
parentab39b113e74751958aac1b125a14ee42bd7d3efd (diff)
parent5c3b74a92aa285a3df722bf6329ba7ccf70346d6 (diff)
downloadlinux-e3144ff52f7d2c884eef352cec9b9ff9acd2eb2f.tar.xz
Merge branch 'rfs-lockless-annotate'
Eric Dumazet says: ==================== rfs: annotate lockless accesses rfs runs without locks held, so we should annotate read and writes to shared variables. It should prevent compilers forcing writes in the following situation: if (var != val) var = val; A compiler could indeed simply avoid the conditional: var = val; This matters if var is shared between many cpus. v2: aligns one closing bracket (Simon) adds Fixes: tags (Jakub) ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/netdevice.h7
-rw-r--r--include/net/sock.h18
2 files changed, 18 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 08fbd4622ccf..e6f22b7403d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -768,8 +768,11 @@ static inline void rps_record_sock_flow(struct rps_sock_flow_table *table,
/* We only give a hint, preemption can change CPU under us */
val |= raw_smp_processor_id();
- if (table->ents[index] != val)
- table->ents[index] = val;
+ /* The following WRITE_ONCE() is paired with the READ_ONCE()
+ * here, and another one in get_rps_cpu().
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(table->ents[index]) != val)
+ WRITE_ONCE(table->ents[index], val);
}
}
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index b418425d7230..6f428a7f3567 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1152,8 +1152,12 @@ static inline void sock_rps_record_flow(const struct sock *sk)
* OR an additional socket flag
* [1] : sk_state and sk_prot are in the same cache line.
*/
- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
- sock_rps_record_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+ /* This READ_ONCE() is paired with the WRITE_ONCE()
+ * from sock_rps_save_rxhash() and sock_rps_reset_rxhash().
+ */
+ sock_rps_record_flow_hash(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash));
+ }
}
#endif
}
@@ -1162,15 +1166,19 @@ static inline void sock_rps_save_rxhash(struct sock *sk,
const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
- if (unlikely(sk->sk_rxhash != skb->hash))
- sk->sk_rxhash = skb->hash;
+ /* The following WRITE_ONCE() is paired with the READ_ONCE()
+ * here, and another one in sock_rps_record_flow().
+ */
+ if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash) != skb->hash))
+ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash, skb->hash);
#endif
}
static inline void sock_rps_reset_rxhash(struct sock *sk)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
- sk->sk_rxhash = 0;
+ /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in sock_rps_record_flow() */
+ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rxhash, 0);
#endif
}