summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHeiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>2026-05-19 14:03:15 +0300
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2026-05-28 13:23:22 +0300
commit88331c4ec23a28c1006ec532fa64763d4c695e90 (patch)
tree5525bb09dddf8f1f9245435518007d39c1c8cc53 /include/linux
parenta9e4e50519e99e5be2d69fa4eebec6a4848ae201 (diff)
downloadlinux-88331c4ec23a28c1006ec532fa64763d4c695e90.tar.xz
seqlock: Allow UBSAN_ALIGNMENT to fail optimizing
With gcc-15 and gcc-16 with UBSAN_ALIGNMENT enabled the compiler fails to inline and optimize __scoped_seqlock_bug() away on s390: s390x-16.1.0-ld: kernel/sched/build_policy.o: in function `__scoped_seqlock_next': /.../seqlock.h:1286:(.text+0x22030): undefined reference to `__scoped_seqlock_bug' Fix this by adding UBSAN_ALIGNMENT to the list of config options where a not inlined empty __scoped_seqlock_bug() is allowed. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260515092057.810542-1-arnd@kernel.org/ Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260519110315.1385307-1-hca@linux.ibm.com
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/seqlock.h7
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 5a40252b8334..f865491c4f2c 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -1259,14 +1259,15 @@ static __always_inline void __scoped_seqlock_cleanup(struct ss_tmp *sst)
extern void __scoped_seqlock_invalid_target(void);
-#if (defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) && CONFIG_GCC_VERSION < 90000) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN)
+#if (defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) && CONFIG_GCC_VERSION < 90000) || \
+ defined(CONFIG_KASAN) || defined(CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT)
/*
* For some reason some GCC-8 architectures (nios2, alpha) have trouble
* determining that the ss_done state is impossible in __scoped_seqlock_next()
* below.
*
- * Similarly KASAN is known to confuse compilers enough to break this. But we
- * don't care about code quality for KASAN builds anyway.
+ * Similarly KASAN and UBSAN_ALIGNMENT are known to confuse compilers enough
+ * to break this. But we don't care about code quality for such builds anyway.
*/
static inline void __scoped_seqlock_bug(void) { }
#else