diff options
| author | Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> | 2026-04-01 13:16:20 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2026-05-29 07:04:40 +0300 |
| commit | 60ced5818f64ac356620d1ad3e0d473c457dbf5b (patch) | |
| tree | 59aaebe7fa3f3abceac87b9d2b1396dd6467ae28 /include/linux | |
| parent | 4aa4abf1f14bd6d0748b7d35a803cc2376a8e20b (diff) | |
| download | linux-60ced5818f64ac356620d1ad3e0d473c457dbf5b.tar.xz | |
vmalloc: optimize vfree with free_pages_bulk()
Whenever vmalloc allocates high order pages (e.g. for a huge mapping) it
must immediately split_page() to order-0 so that it remains compatible
with users that want to access the underlying struct page. Commit
a06157804399 ("mm/vmalloc: request large order pages from buddy
allocator") recently made it much more likely for vmalloc to allocate high
order pages which are subsequently split to order-0.
Unfortunately this had the side effect of causing performance regressions
for tight vmalloc/vfree loops (e.g. test_vmalloc.ko benchmarks). See
Closes: tag. This happens because the high order pages must be gotten
from the buddy but then because they are split to order-0, when they are
freed they are freed to the order-0 pcp. Previously allocation was for
order-0 pages so they were recycled from the pcp.
It would be preferable if when vmalloc allocates an (e.g.) order-3 page
that it also frees that order-3 page to the order-3 pcp, then the
regression could be removed.
So let's do exactly that; update stats separately first as coalescing is
hard to do correctly without complexity. Use free_pages_bulk() which uses
the new __free_contig_range() API to batch-free contiguous ranges of pfns.
This not only removes the regression, but significantly improves
performance of vfree beyond the baseline.
A selection of test_vmalloc benchmarks running on arm64 server class
system. mm-new is the baseline. Commit a06157804399 ("mm/vmalloc:
request large order pages from buddy allocator") was added in v6.19-rc1
where we see regressions. Then with this change performance is much
better. (>0 is faster, <0 is slower, (R)/(I) = statistically significant
Regression/Improvement):
+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------+
| Benchmark | Result Class | mm-new | this series |
+=================+==========================================================+===================+====================+
| micromm/vmalloc | fix_align_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 1331843.33 | (I) 67.17% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 415907.33 | -5.14% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:4, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 755448.00 | (I) 53.55% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:16, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 1591331.33 | (I) 57.26% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:16, h:1, l:500000 (usec) | 1594345.67 | (I) 68.46% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:64, h:0, l:100000 (usec) | 1071826.00 | (I) 79.27% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:64, h:1, l:100000 (usec) | 1018385.00 | (I) 84.17% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:256, h:0, l:100000 (usec) | 3970899.67 | (I) 77.01% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:256, h:1, l:100000 (usec) | 3821788.67 | (I) 89.44% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:512, h:0, l:100000 (usec) | 7795968.00 | (I) 82.67% |
| | fix_size_alloc_test: p:512, h:1, l:100000 (usec) | 6530169.67 | (I) 118.09% |
| | full_fit_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 626808.33 | -0.98% |
| | kvfree_rcu_1_arg_vmalloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 532145.67 | -1.68% |
| | kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 537032.67 | -0.96% |
| | long_busy_list_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 8805069.00 | (I) 74.58% |
| | pcpu_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 500824.67 | 4.35% |
| | random_size_align_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 1637554.67 | (I) 76.99% |
| | random_size_alloc_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 4556288.67 | (I) 72.23% |
| | vm_map_ram_test: p:1, h:0, l:500000 (usec) | 107371.00 | -0.70% |
+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260401101634.2868165-3-usama.anjum@arm.com
Fixes: a06157804399 ("mm/vmalloc: request large order pages from buddy allocator")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66919a28-bc81-49c9-b68f-dd7c73395a0d@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Co-developed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/gfp.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h index 87259e309dee..cdf95a9f0b87 100644 --- a/include/linux/gfp.h +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_noprof(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid, struct page **page_array); #define __alloc_pages_bulk(...) alloc_hooks(alloc_pages_bulk_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)) +void free_pages_bulk(struct page **page_array, unsigned long nr_pages); + unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_mempolicy_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned long nr_pages, struct page **page_array); |
