mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely

MAX_ORDER currently defined as number of orders page allocator supports:
user can ask buddy allocator for page order between 0 and MAX_ORDER-1.

This definition is counter-intuitive and lead to number of bugs all over
the kernel.

Change the definition of MAX_ORDER to be inclusive: the range of orders
user can ask from buddy allocator is 0..MAX_ORDER now.

[kirill@shutemov.name: fix min() warning]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315153800.32wib3n5rickolvh@box
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix another min_t warning]
[kirill@shutemov.name: fixups per Zi Yan]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230316232144.b7ic4cif4kjiabws@box.shutemov.name
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix underlining in docs]
  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191025.VRCTk6mP-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315113133.11326-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>	[powerpc]
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.h
index ef09b23d29e3..8ce14f9d202a 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.h
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct ttm_pool {
 	bool use_dma32;
 
 	struct {
-		struct ttm_pool_type orders[MAX_ORDER];
+		struct ttm_pool_type orders[MAX_ORDER + 1];
 	} caching[TTM_NUM_CACHING_TYPES];
 };