reiserfs: cleanup, reformat comments to normal kernel style

This patch reformats comments in the reiserfs code to fit in 80 columns and
to follow the style rules.

There is no functional change but it helps make my eyes bleed less.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 80 insertions, 72 deletions

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
index 41f788148d44..c7425fdf19f9 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
@@ -172,18 +172,19 @@ static char *is_there_reiserfs_struct(char *fmt, int *what)
 	return k;
 }
 
-/* debugging reiserfs we used to print out a lot of different
-   variables, like keys, item headers, buffer heads etc. Values of
-   most fields matter. So it took a long time just to write
-   appropriative printk. With this reiserfs_warning you can use format
-   specification for complex structures like you used to do with
-   printfs for integers, doubles and pointers. For instance, to print
-   out key structure you have to write just:
-   reiserfs_warning ("bad key %k", key);
-   instead of
-   printk ("bad key %lu %lu %lu %lu", key->k_dir_id, key->k_objectid,
-           key->k_offset, key->k_uniqueness);
-*/
+/*
+ * debugging reiserfs we used to print out a lot of different
+ * variables, like keys, item headers, buffer heads etc. Values of
+ * most fields matter. So it took a long time just to write
+ * appropriative printk. With this reiserfs_warning you can use format
+ * specification for complex structures like you used to do with
+ * printfs for integers, doubles and pointers. For instance, to print
+ * out key structure you have to write just:
+ * reiserfs_warning ("bad key %k", key);
+ * instead of
+ * printk ("bad key %lu %lu %lu %lu", key->k_dir_id, key->k_objectid,
+ *         key->k_offset, key->k_uniqueness);
+ */
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(error_lock);
 static void prepare_error_buf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 {
@@ -243,15 +244,16 @@ static void prepare_error_buf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 
 }
 
-/* in addition to usual conversion specifiers this accepts reiserfs
-   specific conversion specifiers:
-   %k to print little endian key,
-   %K to print cpu key,
-   %h to print item_head,
-   %t to print directory entry
-   %z to print block head (arg must be struct buffer_head *
-   %b to print buffer_head
-*/
+/*
+ * in addition to usual conversion specifiers this accepts reiserfs
+ * specific conversion specifiers:
+ * %k to print little endian key,
+ * %K to print cpu key,
+ * %h to print item_head,
+ * %t to print directory entry
+ * %z to print block head (arg must be struct buffer_head *
+ * %b to print buffer_head
+ */
 
 #define do_reiserfs_warning(fmt)\
 {\
@@ -304,50 +306,52 @@ void reiserfs_debug(struct super_block *s, int level, const char *fmt, ...)
 #endif
 }
 
-/* The format:
-
-           maintainer-errorid: [function-name:] message
-
-    where errorid is unique to the maintainer and function-name is
-    optional, is recommended, so that anyone can easily find the bug
-    with a simple grep for the short to type string
-    maintainer-errorid.  Don't bother with reusing errorids, there are
-    lots of numbers out there.
-
-    Example:
-
-    reiserfs_panic(
-	p_sb, "reiser-29: reiserfs_new_blocknrs: "
-	"one of search_start or rn(%d) is equal to MAX_B_NUM,"
-	"which means that we are optimizing location based on the bogus location of a temp buffer (%p).",
-	rn, bh
-    );
-
-    Regular panic()s sometimes clear the screen before the message can
-    be read, thus the need for the while loop.
-
-    Numbering scheme for panic used by Vladimir and Anatoly( Hans completely ignores this scheme, and considers it
-    pointless complexity):
-
-    panics in reiserfs.h have numbers from 1000 to 1999
-    super.c				        2000 to 2999
-    preserve.c (unused)			    3000 to 3999
-    bitmap.c				    4000 to 4999
-    stree.c				        5000 to 5999
-    prints.c				    6000 to 6999
-    namei.c                     7000 to 7999
-    fix_nodes.c                 8000 to 8999
-    dir.c                       9000 to 9999
-	lbalance.c					10000 to 10999
-	ibalance.c		11000 to 11999 not ready
-	do_balan.c		12000 to 12999
-	inode.c			13000 to 13999
-	file.c			14000 to 14999
-    objectid.c                       15000 - 15999
-    buffer.c                         16000 - 16999
-    symlink.c                        17000 - 17999
-
-   .  */
+/*
+ * The format:
+ *
+ *          maintainer-errorid: [function-name:] message
+ *
+ *   where errorid is unique to the maintainer and function-name is
+ *   optional, is recommended, so that anyone can easily find the bug
+ *   with a simple grep for the short to type string
+ *   maintainer-errorid.  Don't bother with reusing errorids, there are
+ *   lots of numbers out there.
+ *
+ *   Example:
+ *
+ *   reiserfs_panic(
+ *     p_sb, "reiser-29: reiserfs_new_blocknrs: "
+ *     "one of search_start or rn(%d) is equal to MAX_B_NUM,"
+ *     "which means that we are optimizing location based on the "
+ *     "bogus location of a temp buffer (%p).",
+ *     rn, bh
+ *   );
+ *
+ *   Regular panic()s sometimes clear the screen before the message can
+ *   be read, thus the need for the while loop.
+ *
+ *   Numbering scheme for panic used by Vladimir and Anatoly( Hans completely
+ *   ignores this scheme, and considers it pointless complexity):
+ *
+ *   panics in reiserfs_fs.h have numbers from 1000 to 1999
+ *   super.c			2000 to 2999
+ *   preserve.c (unused)	3000 to 3999
+ *   bitmap.c			4000 to 4999
+ *   stree.c			5000 to 5999
+ *   prints.c			6000 to 6999
+ *   namei.c			7000 to 7999
+ *   fix_nodes.c		8000 to 8999
+ *   dir.c			9000 to 9999
+ *   lbalance.c			10000 to 10999
+ *   ibalance.c			11000 to 11999 not ready
+ *   do_balan.c			12000 to 12999
+ *   inode.c			13000 to 13999
+ *   file.c			14000 to 14999
+ *   objectid.c			15000 - 15999
+ *   buffer.c			16000 - 16999
+ *   symlink.c			17000 - 17999
+ *
+ *  .  */
 
 void __reiserfs_panic(struct super_block *sb, const char *id,
 		      const char *function, const char *fmt, ...)
@@ -411,9 +415,11 @@ void reiserfs_abort(struct super_block *sb, int errno, const char *fmt, ...)
 	reiserfs_abort_journal(sb, errno);
 }
 
-/* this prints internal nodes (4 keys/items in line) (dc_number,
-   dc_size)[k_dirid, k_objectid, k_offset, k_uniqueness](dc_number,
-   dc_size)...*/
+/*
+ * this prints internal nodes (4 keys/items in line) (dc_number,
+ * dc_size)[k_dirid, k_objectid, k_offset, k_uniqueness](dc_number,
+ * dc_size)...
+ */
 static int print_internal(struct buffer_head *bh, int first, int last)
 {
 	struct reiserfs_key *key;
@@ -543,9 +549,11 @@ static int print_super_block(struct buffer_head *bh)
 	printk("Block count %u\n", sb_block_count(rs));
 	printk("Blocksize %d\n", sb_blocksize(rs));
 	printk("Free blocks %u\n", sb_free_blocks(rs));
-	// FIXME: this would be confusing if
-	// someone stores reiserfs super block in some data block ;)
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: this would be confusing if
+	 * someone stores reiserfs super block in some data block ;)
 //    skipped = (bh->b_blocknr * bh->b_size) / sb_blocksize(rs);
+	 */
 	skipped = bh->b_blocknr;
 	data_blocks = sb_block_count(rs) - skipped - 1 - sb_bmap_nr(rs) -
 	    (!is_reiserfs_jr(rs) ? sb_jp_journal_size(rs) +
@@ -581,8 +589,8 @@ static int print_desc_block(struct buffer_head *bh)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
-void print_block(struct buffer_head *bh, ...)	//int print_mode, int first, int last)
+/* ..., int print_mode, int first, int last) */
+void print_block(struct buffer_head *bh, ...)
 {
 	va_list args;
 	int mode, first, last;