diff options
author | Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> | 2008-02-05 09:29:36 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2008-02-05 20:44:19 +0300 |
commit | 8bc3be2751b4f74ab90a446da1912fd8204d53f7 (patch) | |
tree | 2bc514025a906203244d98de70fb6bd87f3ac9ac /fs/fs-writeback.c | |
parent | a322f8ab66f50b6c0dcdb59abae84fede7a5fded (diff) | |
download | linux-8bc3be2751b4f74ab90a446da1912fd8204d53f7.tar.xz |
writeback: speed up writeback of big dirty files
After making dirty a 100M file, the normal behavior is to start the
writeback for all data after 30s delays. But sometimes the following
happens instead:
- after 30s: ~4M
- after 5s: ~4M
- after 5s: all remaining 92M
Some analyze shows that the internal io dispatch queues goes like this:
s_io s_more_io
-------------------------
1) 100M,1K 0
2) 1K 96M
3) 0 96M
1) initial state with a 100M file and a 1K file
2) 4M written, nr_to_write <= 0, so write more
3) 1K written, nr_to_write > 0, no more writes(BUG)
nr_to_write > 0 in (3) fools the upper layer to think that data have all
been written out. The big dirty file is actually still sitting in
s_more_io. We cannot simply splice s_more_io back to s_io as soon as s_io
becomes empty, and let the loop in generic_sync_sb_inodes() continue: this
may starve newly expired inodes in s_dirty. It is also not an option to
draw inodes from both s_more_io and s_dirty, an let the loop go on: this
might lead to live locks, and might also starve other superblocks in sync
time(well kupdate may still starve some superblocks, that's another bug).
We have to return when a full scan of s_io completes. So nr_to_write > 0
does not necessarily mean that "all data are written". This patch
introduces a flag writeback_control.more_io to indicate that more io should
be done. With it the big dirty file no longer has to wait for the next
kupdate invokation 5s later.
In sync_sb_inodes() we only set more_io on super_blocks we actually
visited. This avoids the interaction between two pdflush deamons.
Also in __sync_single_inode() we don't blindly keep requeuing the io if the
filesystem cannot progress. Failing to do so may lead to 100% iowait.
Tested-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fs-writeback.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/fs-writeback.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 3fe782d70a71..0b3064079fa5 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -284,7 +284,17 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc) * soon as the queue becomes uncongested. */ inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; - requeue_io(inode); + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { + /* + * slice used up: queue for next turn + */ + requeue_io(inode); + } else { + /* + * somehow blocked: retry later + */ + redirty_tail(inode); + } } else { /* * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that @@ -468,8 +478,12 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc) iput(inode); cond_resched(); spin_lock(&inode_lock); - if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { + wbc->more_io = 1; break; + } + if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io)) + wbc->more_io = 1; } return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */ } |