summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>2022-06-17 15:53:34 +0300
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2022-07-25 18:45:37 +0300
commit1f4f639fe729bcfe097fa6c2305eea664110bf6a (patch)
treeb85187ae7385acc7e0dbfd4f8818120553ae002b /fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
parent3613249a1b30ef6f7a7566e39878ea550af51049 (diff)
downloadlinux-1f4f639fe729bcfe097fa6c2305eea664110bf6a.tar.xz
btrfs: batch up release of reserved metadata for delayed items used for deletion
With Filipe's recent rework of the delayed inode code one aspect which isn't batched is the release of the reserved metadata of delayed inode's delete items. With this patch on top of Filipe's rework and running the same test as provided in the description of a patch titled "btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items" I observe the following change of the number of calls to btrfs_block_rsv_release: Before this change: - block_rsv_release: 1004 - btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 14602 - delete_batches: 505 After: - block_rsv_release: 510 - btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 13643 - delete_batches: 507 Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c17
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index 812e7da504b5..e7f34871a132 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -864,11 +864,13 @@ static int btrfs_batch_delete_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
{
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr, *next;
struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
LIST_HEAD(batch_list);
int nitems, slot, last_slot;
int ret;
+ u64 total_reserved_size = item->bytes_reserved;
ASSERT(leaf != NULL);
@@ -905,14 +907,27 @@ static int btrfs_batch_delete_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
nitems++;
curr = next;
list_add_tail(&curr->tree_list, &batch_list);
+ total_reserved_size += curr->bytes_reserved;
}
ret = btrfs_del_items(trans, root, path, path->slots[0], nitems);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /* In case of BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING items won't have reserved space */
+ if (total_reserved_size > 0) {
+ /*
+ * Check btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() to see why we
+ * don't need to release/reserve qgroup space.
+ */
+ trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_item",
+ item->key.objectid, total_reserved_size,
+ 0);
+ btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv,
+ total_reserved_size, NULL);
+ }
+
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, &batch_list, tree_list) {
- btrfs_delayed_item_release_metadata(root, curr);
list_del(&curr->tree_list);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(curr);
}