drm/i915: Turn off g4x DP port in .post_disable()

While Bspec doesn't list a specific sequence for turning off the DP port
on g4x we are getting an underrun if the port is disabled in the
.disable() hook. Looks like the pipe stops when the port stops, and by
that time the plane disable may not have completed yet. Also the plane(s)
seem to end up in some wonky state when this happens as they also signal
another underrun immediately after we turn them back on during the next
enable sequence.

We could add a vblank wait in .disable() to avoid wedging the planes,
but I assume we're still tripping up the pipe in some way. So it seems
better to me to just follow the ILK+ sequence and turn off the DP port
in .post_disable() instead. This sequence doesn't seem to suffer from
this problem. Could be it was always the intended sequence for DP and
the gen4 bspec was just never updated to include it.

Originally we used the bad sequence even on ilk+, but I changed that
in commit 08aff3fe26ae ("drm/i915: Move DP port disable to post_disable
for pch platforms") as it was causing issues on those platforms as well.
I left out g4x then only because I didn't have the hardware to test it.
Now that I do it's fairly clear that the ilk+ sequence is also the
right choice for g4x.

v2: Fix whitespace fail (Jani)
    Mention the ilk+ commit (Jani)

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180613160553.11664-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 51a9f6dfc00d35f927ecfaf6f0ae8ebaba39b3fe)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions