diff options
| author | Alice Chao <alice.chao@mediatek.com> | 2023-04-24 11:03:56 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> | 2023-04-25 06:18:41 +0300 |
| commit | 948afc69615167a3c82430f99bfd046332b89912 (patch) | |
| tree | bf07ed4e0bbd9cf2d700efa8add0f1ed5d9e4300 /drivers/ufs | |
| parent | 392e4daa8a7e3d9b103c64acef08f62f19d421aa (diff) | |
| download | linux-948afc69615167a3c82430f99bfd046332b89912.tar.xz | |
scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Fix &hwq->cq_lock deadlock issue
When ufshcd_err_handler() is executed, CQ event interrupt can enter waiting
for the same lock. This can happen in ufshcd_handle_mcq_cq_events() and
also in ufs_mtk_mcq_intr(). The following warning message will be generated
when &hwq->cq_lock is used in IRQ context with IRQ enabled. Use
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock to
resolve the deadlock issue.
[name:lockdep&]WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[name:lockdep&]--------------------------------
[name:lockdep&]inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[name:lockdep&]kworker/u16:4/260 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffffff8028444600 (&hwq->cq_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at:
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
[name:lockdep&]{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
_raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
ufs_mtk_mcq_intr+0x60/0x1bc [ufs_mediatek_mod]
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x140/0x3ec
handle_irq_event+0x50/0xd8
handle_fasteoi_irq+0x148/0x2b0
generic_handle_domain_irq+0x4c/0x6c
gic_handle_irq+0x58/0x134
call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x74
do_interrupt_handler+0x84/0xe4
el1_interrupt+0x3c/0x78
<snip>
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&hwq->cq_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&hwq->cq_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u16:4/260:
[name:lockdep&]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 PID: 260 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Tainted: G S W OE
6.1.17-mainline-android14-2-g277223301adb #1
Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x10c/0x160
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8
dump_stack+0x20/0x60
print_usage_bug+0x584/0x76c
mark_lock_irq+0x488/0x510
mark_lock+0x1ec/0x25c
__lock_acquire+0x4d8/0xffc
lock_acquire+0x17c/0x33c
_raw_spin_lock+0x5c/0x7c
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock+0x30/0xe0
ufshcd_poll+0x68/0x1b0
ufshcd_transfer_req_compl+0x9c/0xc8
ufshcd_err_handler+0x3bc/0xea0
process_one_work+0x2f4/0x7e8
worker_thread+0x234/0x450
kthread+0x110/0x134
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Fixes: ed975065c31c ("scsi: ufs: core: mcq: Add completion support in poll")
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Alice Chao <alice.chao@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424080400.8955-1-alice.chao@mediatek.com
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ufs')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c index 31df052fbc41..202ff71e1b58 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c @@ -299,11 +299,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock); unsigned long ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufs_hw_queue *hwq) { - unsigned long completed_reqs; + unsigned long completed_reqs, flags; - spin_lock(&hwq->cq_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&hwq->cq_lock, flags); completed_reqs = ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock(hba, hwq); - spin_unlock(&hwq->cq_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwq->cq_lock, flags); return completed_reqs; } |