summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>2017-08-23 21:45:01 +0300
committerBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>2017-08-25 06:59:50 +0300
commitbe3e83e3471cd0faff2c2d88fe9cfc73d9a9745a (patch)
tree7f95cf515d56da4b1f4aac1f60e782271d5e8472 /drivers/mtd/nand/atmel
parentb974696da1cfc5aa0c29ed97dc8f6c239899e64b (diff)
downloadlinux-be3e83e3471cd0faff2c2d88fe9cfc73d9a9745a.tar.xz
mtd: nand: atmel: Relax tADL_min constraint
Version 4 of the ONFI spec mandates that tADL be at least 400 nanoseconds, but, depending on the master clock rate, 400 ns may not fit in the tADL field of the SMC reg. We need to relax the check and accept the -ERANGE return code. Note that previous versions of the ONFI spec had a lower tADL_min (100 or 200 ns). It's not clear why this timing constraint got increased but it seems most NANDs are fine with values lower than 400ns, so we should be safe. Fixes: f9ce2eddf176 ("mtd: nand: atmel: Add ->setup_data_interface() hooks") Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Tested-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/nand/atmel')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c13
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
index 2c8baa0c2c4e..ceec21bd30c4 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c
@@ -1364,7 +1364,18 @@ static int atmel_smc_nand_prepare_smcconf(struct atmel_nand *nand,
ret = atmel_smc_cs_conf_set_timing(smcconf,
ATMEL_HSMC_TIMINGS_TADL_SHIFT,
ncycles);
- if (ret)
+ /*
+ * Version 4 of the ONFI spec mandates that tADL be at least 400
+ * nanoseconds, but, depending on the master clock rate, 400 ns may not
+ * fit in the tADL field of the SMC reg. We need to relax the check and
+ * accept the -ERANGE return code.
+ *
+ * Note that previous versions of the ONFI spec had a lower tADL_min
+ * (100 or 200 ns). It's not clear why this timing constraint got
+ * increased but it seems most NANDs are fine with values lower than
+ * 400ns, so we should be safe.
+ */
+ if (ret && ret != -ERANGE)
return ret;
ncycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(conf->timings.sdr.tAR_min, mckperiodps);