summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>2010-07-15 18:51:10 +0400
committerDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>2010-07-16 05:27:01 +0400
commit8d369bb196f1f9111cb7ab839d4f420378fa7b30 (patch)
tree50fab6e264572f10b5635581789532d3962d54c9 /drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c
parent5099fa7f23d3711538cbe9fe072b4ce1ba814035 (diff)
downloadlinux-8d369bb196f1f9111cb7ab839d4f420378fa7b30.tar.xz
drm/radeon/kms: fix gtt MC base alignment on rs4xx/rs690/rs740 asics
The asics in question have the following requirements with regard to their gart setups: 1. The GART aperture size has to be in the form of 2^X bytes, where X is from 25 to 31 2. The GART aperture MC base has to be aligned to a boundary equal to the size of the aperture. 3. The GART page table has to be aligned to the boundary equal to the size of the table. 4. The GART page table size is: table_entry_size * (aperture_size / page_size) 5. The GART page table has to be allocated in non-paged, non-cached, contiguous system memory. This patch takes care 2. The rest should already be handled properly. This fixes a regression noticed by: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> Tested-by: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c
index 34330df28483..694af7cc23ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r520.c
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ void r520_mc_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
r520_vram_get_type(rdev);
r100_vram_init_sizes(rdev);
radeon_vram_location(rdev, &rdev->mc, 0);
+ rdev->mc.gtt_base_align = 0;
if (!(rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_AGP))
radeon_gtt_location(rdev, &rdev->mc);
radeon_update_bandwidth_info(rdev);