diff options
author | Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com> | 2018-03-14 03:32:53 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> | 2018-03-14 16:35:37 +0300 |
commit | f08e2035cc089caf52ce57e855d96ba6ba90c71a (patch) | |
tree | e3f2ff35a72632f20565bbb7a8884bce8a8bed2c /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | |
parent | 96c83d35a26f7ba06a1623adaf872b56d54fe093 (diff) | |
download | linux-f08e2035cc089caf52ce57e855d96ba6ba90c71a.tar.xz |
drm/i915/guc: Check the locking status of GuC WOPCM registers
GuC WOPCM registers are write-once registers. Current driver code accesses
these registers without checking the accessibility to these registers which
will lead to unpredictable driver behaviors if these registers were touch
by other components (such as faulty BIOS code).
This patch moves the GuC WOPCM registers updating code into intel_wopcm.c
and adds check before and after the update to GuC WOPCM registers so that
we can make sure the driver is in a known state after writing to these
write-once registers.
v6:
- Made sure module reloading won't bug the kernel while doing
locking status checking
v7:
- Fixed patch format issues
v8:
- Fixed coding style issue on register lock bit macro definition (Sagar)
v9:
- Avoided to use redundant !! to cast uint to bool (Chris)
- Return error code instead of GEM_BUG_ON for locked with invalid register
values case (Sagar)
- Updated guc_wopcm_hw_init to use guc_wopcm as first parameter (Michal)
- Added code to set and validate the HuC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC bit in GuC
WOPCM offset register based on the presence of HuC firmware (Michal)
- Use bit fields instead of macros for GuC WOPCM flags (Michal)
v10:
- Refined variable names, removed redundant comments (Joonas)
- Introduced lockable_reg to handle the write once register write and
propagate the write error to caller (Joonas)
- Used lockable_reg abstraction to avoid locking bit check on generic
i915_reg_t (Michal)
- Added log message for error paths (Michal)
- Removed hw_updated flag and only relies on real hardware status
v11:
- Replaced lockable_reg with simplified function (Michal)
- Used new macros for locking bits of WOPCM size/offset registers instead
of using BIT(0) directly (Michal)
- use intel_wopcm_init_hw() called from intel_gem_init_hw() to do GuC
WOPCM register setup instead of calling from intel_uc_init_hw() (Michal)
v12:
- Updated function kernel-doc to align with code changes (Michal)
- Updated code to use wopcm pointer directly (Michal)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
BSpec: 10875, 10833
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-5-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 64 |
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c index 1fd1125f464b..4117886bfb05 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c @@ -207,3 +207,67 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm) return 0; } + +static inline int write_and_verify(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + i915_reg_t reg, u32 val, u32 mask, + u32 locked_bit) +{ + u32 reg_val; + + GEM_BUG_ON(val & ~mask); + + I915_WRITE(reg, val); + + reg_val = I915_READ(reg); + + return (reg_val & mask) != (val | locked_bit) ? -EIO : 0; +} + +/** + * intel_wopcm_init_hw() - Setup GuC WOPCM registers. + * @wopcm: pointer to intel_wopcm. + * + * Setup the GuC WOPCM size and offset registers with the calculated values. It + * will verify the register values to make sure the registers are locked with + * correct values. + * + * Return: 0 on success. -EIO if registers were locked with incorrect values. + */ +int intel_wopcm_init_hw(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = wopcm_to_i915(wopcm); + u32 huc_agent; + u32 mask; + int err; + + if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv)) + return 0; + + GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)); + GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.size); + GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.base); + + err = write_and_verify(dev_priv, GUC_WOPCM_SIZE, wopcm->guc.size, + GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_MASK | GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_LOCKED, + GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_LOCKED); + if (err) + goto err_out; + + huc_agent = USES_HUC(dev_priv) ? HUC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC : 0; + mask = GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_MASK | GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALID | huc_agent; + err = write_and_verify(dev_priv, DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET, + wopcm->guc.base | huc_agent, mask, + GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALID); + if (err) + goto err_out; + + return 0; + +err_out: + DRM_ERROR("Failed to init WOPCM registers:\n"); + DRM_ERROR("DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET=%#x\n", + I915_READ(DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET)); + DRM_ERROR("GUC_WOPCM_SIZE=%#x\n", I915_READ(GUC_WOPCM_SIZE)); + + return err; +} |