KVM: x86: don't hold kvm->lock in KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING

We needed the lock to avoid racing with creation of the irqchip on x86. As
kvm_set_irq_routing() calls srcu_synchronize_expedited(), this lock
might be held for a longer time.

Let's introduce an arch specific callback to check if we can actually
add irq routes. For x86, all we have to do is check if we have an
irqchip in the kernel. We don't need kvm->lock at that point as the
irqchip is marked as inititalized only when actually fully created.

Reported-by: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1df6ddede10a ("KVM: x86: race between KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING and KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

4 files changed, 11 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 84c8489531bb..f5bddf92faba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -728,7 +728,6 @@ struct kvm_hv {
 
 enum kvm_irqchip_mode {
 	KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE,
-	KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS, /* temporarily set during creation */
 	KVM_IRQCHIP_KERNEL,       /* created with KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP */
 	KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT,        /* created with KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP */
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
index 0edd22c3344c..d5005cc26521 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.h
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	/* Matches smp_wmb() when setting irqchip_mode */
 	smp_rmb();
-	return mode > KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS;
+	return mode != KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
 }
 
 void kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
index 4517a4c2ac3a..3cc3b2d130a0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
@@ -274,16 +274,19 @@ void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin,
 	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->irq_srcu, idx);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	return irqchip_in_kernel(kvm);
+}
+
 int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm *kvm,
 			  struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
 			  const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue)
 {
-	/* also allow creation of routes during KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS */
-	if (kvm->arch.irqchip_mode == KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	/* Matches smp_wmb() when setting irqchip_mode */
-	smp_rmb();
+	/* We can't check irqchip_in_kernel() here as some callers are
+	 * currently inititalizing the irqchip. Other callers should therefore
+	 * check kvm_arch_can_set_irq_routing() before calling this function.
+	 */
 	switch (ue->type) {
 	case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP:
 		if (irqchip_split(kvm))
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index be2ade58edb9..2fe9aa116288 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3919,14 +3919,9 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 			goto split_irqchip_unlock;
 		if (kvm->created_vcpus)
 			goto split_irqchip_unlock;
-		kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS;
 		r = kvm_setup_empty_irq_routing(kvm);
-		if (r) {
-			kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
-			/* Pairs with smp_rmb() when reading irqchip_mode */
-			smp_wmb();
+		if (r)
 			goto split_irqchip_unlock;
-		}
 		/* Pairs with irqchip_in_kernel. */
 		smp_wmb();
 		kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT;
@@ -4012,12 +4007,8 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 			goto create_irqchip_unlock;
 		}
 
-		kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_INIT_IN_PROGRESS;
 		r = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
 		if (r) {
-			kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE;
-			/* Pairs with smp_rmb() when reading irqchip_mode */
-			smp_wmb();
 			kvm_ioapic_destroy(kvm);
 			kvm_pic_destroy(kvm);
 			goto create_irqchip_unlock;