diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-03-12 04:02:44 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-03-12 04:02:44 +0300 |
commit | 1f75619a721d5149d9a947f2177d3cffc473fbb7 (patch) | |
tree | fc783167a249fdbfead818c40dfad073f6b6758b /arch | |
parent | 38b334fc767e44816be087b3ec5d84b1438b735f (diff) | |
parent | d54e56f31a34fa38fcb5e91df609f9633419a79a (diff) | |
download | linux-1f75619a721d5149d9a947f2177d3cffc473fbb7.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'x86_misc_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull misc x86 fixes from Borislav Petkov:
- Fix a wrong check in the function reporting whether a CPU executes
(or not) a NMI handler
- Ratelimit unknown NMIs messages in order to not potentially slow down
the machine
- Other fixlets
* tag 'x86_misc_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/nmi: Fix the inverse "in NMI handler" check
Documentation/maintainer-tip: Add C++ tail comments exception
Documentation/maintainer-tip: Add Closes tag
x86/nmi: Rate limit unknown NMI messages
Documentation/kernel-parameters: Add spec_rstack_overflow to mitigations=off
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index 397ef9fcf5e9..56e7a9e2737a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c @@ -304,13 +304,13 @@ unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs) __this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.unknown, 1); - pr_emerg("Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason %02x on CPU %d.\n", - reason, smp_processor_id()); + pr_emerg_ratelimited("Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason %02x on CPU %d.\n", + reason, smp_processor_id()); if (unknown_nmi_panic || panic_on_unrecovered_nmi) nmi_panic(regs, "NMI: Not continuing"); - pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n"); + pr_emerg_ratelimited("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n"); } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unknown_nmi_error); @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ void nmi_backtrace_stall_check(const struct cpumask *btp) msgp = nmi_check_stall_msg[idx]; if (nsp->idt_ignored_snap != READ_ONCE(nsp->idt_ignored) && (idx & 0x1)) modp = ", but OK because ignore_nmis was set"; - if (nmi_seq & ~0x1) + if (nmi_seq & 0x1) msghp = " (CPU currently in NMI handler function)"; else if (nsp->idt_nmi_seq_snap + 1 == nmi_seq) msghp = " (CPU exited one NMI handler function)"; |